UK: Feminist MP Who Campaigned Against Men-Only Clubs Joins Gender-Segregated Muslim March
Vanity Fair: New Doc Says Elon Musk Had ‘A Degree of Certainty’ About...
Fetterman Crosses the Aisle: Democratic Senator Praises Trump at RNC, Infuriates His Own...
Gubernatorial Candidate Says Her Pronouns Are Mom, Texan, and Soon-To-Be Governor
Pray the Grounded Girls Get Chosen Before the Bitter Ones Hoard the Good...
'I'm Saving Your Number': CBS' Gayle King Fangirls Over Lindsay Clancy's Attorney
Hunter Biden Launches $LAPTOP Memecoin, Which Crashes 99 Percent Two Hours After Launch
Brian Stelter Has a Pic From the Packed House at Oliver Darcy's 'Information...
Mehdi Hasan Wants Apologies From Those Who Insisted War Would Stop If Hamas...
FAIL: James Talarico Tries to Convince a Reporter He No Longer Believes All...
Joe Scarborough: White House Will Hate the Success of Tennis Star From S**thole...
Those CREEPY HANDS! Gavin Newsom Scolds JD Vance While Bragging About Healthcare for...
‘Let’s Roll’: Flight 93 Hero Todd Beamer’s Father Endorses Mike Rogers — ‘Vote...
Ted Cruz Cites CNN's Reporting on James Talarico (Kaitlan Collins Runs Cover for...
American Heroes of 9/11: Officer John W. Perry

Dave French Plays Dumb for Dems' Even Dumber Sedition Stunt

NBC

Golly and shucks! What's so wrong with saying that the military shouldn't follow illegal orders?

What's the thing of when activists do something provocative yet completely manufactured and the media plays along with their charade? For example, this author remembers an incident from years ago when pro-pot activists were on the news, and during the interview, one of the activists lit a joint on camera.

Advertisement

Dutifully, the reporter said that the interviewee was so nervous about being on TV that she just had to light up. The reporter clearly played along with her stunt and implicitly made the case for marijuana legalization.

The same thing is happening here in the context of the six Democrat legislators' 'disobey illegal orders' stunt video.

'What could possibly be wrong with that? It's true!'

OK, sure. But you have to know that it's really just a very thinly veiled message is that Trump is giving illegal orders and that he must be resisted. Sure, they can't outright say it, they need plausible deniability, but anyone who hears that knew exactly what it meant.

David French, who is a lot of things, is not dumb. So this schtick is even more pathetic than the usual engagement slop. 

So one of the New York Times' favorite conservatives (i.e. a conservative who opposes the right and especially Trump) issues his phony 'babe in the woods' naive take.

Advertisement

Let's dissect why French's take is both disingenuous and wrong.

That's how it came across.

You see it, we all see it. Even David French sees it. We're not going to pretend that his TDS blinded him.

We see what you did there, and it's brilliant.

Advertisement

Another fitting analogy. French shrugs, collects the check.

Funny, that.

Seriously. He's gone over to the Dark Side.

  • Editor's Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives.


Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement