Ruben Gallego’s Sweet Deal: Campaign Cash for Super Bowl Trips, Disney Vacations &...
NYT Turns Father’s Day Into ‘Trans Dads’ Day — And Proves How Out...
A High Percentage of Filers Got a Cut, House GOP Boasts
Leftist Meltdown: Keith Edwards Accused of Darkening Crockett's Skin After Questioning Her...
Father’s Day Through the Void: Grief, Gratitude, and the Irreplaceable Role of Good...
Sen. Rand Paul Fumes About Healthcare Expense
YIKES: Did Jasmine Crockett Just Tell Democrats to POUND SAND? Because It Sounds...
Marc Elias Tries (and Fails) to Rewrite Mail-In Ballot Voting History
How Keith Ellison Reacts to Journo Asking Him About Minnesota Fraud PROVES He...
DAAAMN, Son: UK Survivor Helps SHRED Mehdi Hasan in BRUTAL Back and Forth...
Humza Yousaf Wastes NO Time Turning Edinburgh 'Attack' Into 'Muslims Are the Real...
Jessica Tarlov's 'He COULD Be a Weird, Gay Vegan BUT' Save for James...
Police Release Photo of Karmelo Anthony’s Multi-Tool ‘Like With the Little Scissors’
Panefully Stupid: KTVU Reports Car Break-Ins Decline, Glass Repair Shops Hardest Hit
TRAs in Scotland Upset That Men Who Think They're Women Will Be Incarcerated...

Susan Rice Says This NYT Op-Ed Debunks the Docs Tulsi Gabbard's Been Dropping (Guess Who Wrote It)

Twitter

Well, we're totally convinced that the information Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been putting out about the Russia collusion hoax ahead of the 2016 election has been fully debunked.

Advertisement

Well, maybe we're not actually very convinced, but Susan Rice shared an op-ed that she says is a thorough debunking of what's coming out the the DNI's office. Oh, and it's worth noting that the op-ed was written by James Clapper, John Brennan, and perhaps a few attorneys: 

Brennan and Clapper? Ha! So basically it depends on what your definition of "debunked" is. 

We're just at the beginning of the "screaming" process regarding the Dem freakout about the exposure of their shenanigans. 

Two of the guys implicated in the "Russia collusion" hoax had an op-ed published in the Times, then libs cite that as proof "debunking" the original material. It's like a defense attorney showing the jury an article the defendant wrote about why he's innocent and saying it sinks the prosecution's case. 

Advertisement

Hey, who knows!? If you haven't yet heard about the "burn bag bonanza" read more about that here

Yeah, that is weird. 

By the way, the broadcast networks have devoted very little coverage to the documents Gabbard's been releasing (as in "less than a minute"). You can't loathe the MSM too much. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement