Deported With a Baby and $190: Sam Stein Calls It 'Heinous' Cruelty, but...
Jill Filipovic Gets Salty: Babies Don't Need Two Parents If Mom Has Money...
Plot Twist! Transgender Hockey Shooter Allegedly Has an Arsonist Son (and Other Updates)
MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Learned the Truth About Talarico’s ‘Banned’ Interview But Pushed...
Dozens of Donalds: AI Video Offers a Peek at What Trump Would Look...
Is This What You Voted For? ICE Detains Husband After More Than 30...
Houston Chronicle: Anti-ICE Student Walkouts Were a ‘Fantastic Educational Experience’
Face, Meet Plant: Sharice Davids Uses Actual Copypasta to Wish Her 'Neighbors' a...
Seattle’s New Socialist Mayor Kicks Off State of the City Address With a...
Hollywood Reporter: Say Goodbye to Political Candidates on Daytime and Late-Night Talk Sho...
Did DEI Play a Role in the Massive Sewage Leak Into the Potomac?
From Grief to Gratitude: D.C. Grandma Tears Up Thanking Trump for Caring About...
French President Emmanuel Macron Says Free Speech Is ’Pure Bulls**t’ Unless Regulated
Hey Look! NYC Mayor Mamdani Found Spending He MIGHT Be Willing to Cut...
James Talarico Preaches to Stephen Colbert That Jesus Never Mentioned Abortion

Susan Rice Says This NYT Op-Ed Debunks the Docs Tulsi Gabbard's Been Dropping (Guess Who Wrote It)

Twitter

Well, we're totally convinced that the information Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been putting out about the Russia collusion hoax ahead of the 2016 election has been fully debunked.

Advertisement

Well, maybe we're not actually very convinced, but Susan Rice shared an op-ed that she says is a thorough debunking of what's coming out the the DNI's office. Oh, and it's worth noting that the op-ed was written by James Clapper, John Brennan, and perhaps a few attorneys: 

Brennan and Clapper? Ha! So basically it depends on what your definition of "debunked" is. 

We're just at the beginning of the "screaming" process regarding the Dem freakout about the exposure of their shenanigans. 

Two of the guys implicated in the "Russia collusion" hoax had an op-ed published in the Times, then libs cite that as proof "debunking" the original material. It's like a defense attorney showing the jury an article the defendant wrote about why he's innocent and saying it sinks the prosecution's case. 

Advertisement

Hey, who knows!? If you haven't yet heard about the "burn bag bonanza" read more about that here

Yeah, that is weird. 

By the way, the broadcast networks have devoted very little coverage to the documents Gabbard's been releasing (as in "less than a minute"). You can't loathe the MSM too much. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement