Chris Hayes: The Most Left-Wing People Have Postgraduate Degrees but Are Financially Strap...
Trans Wisconsin Assembly Candidate Who Lives in Poverty Pledges to Be GOP's Worst...
Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Says 'ICE Has Nothing to Do With Immigration'
Rep Ayanna Pressley Asks History Professor Why Neo-Fascist Autocrats Attack Museums
Worth Every Penny: Why Choosing Your Child’s Peers Matters More Than Test Scores
Nice Timing: Marc Elias Says: Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Demanding New Jersey Release Voter...
Election Results LIVE on Twitchy! Arizona on Tap Tonight
'Politeness is White Supremacy?' Rep. Gill Grills Smithsonian Director on Their Own Woke...
Even a Senior Mamdani Administration Official Says There's No Way He's Arresting Benjamin...
CRAZY Jasmine Crockett Implodes: Calls GOP Hearing a 'Republican White Pride Rally'
Former Sanders Outreach Chief: Bernie Has Endorsed the Most Antisemitic Candidates in a...
Jasmine Crockett Exposes the Racism Behind the World Cup Final
CNN’s Own Legal Expert Buries BIG Dummy Zohran Mamdani’s Netanyahu Arrest Threat: 'A...
Jim Accosted?: Ex-CNN ‘Journo’ Recounts Terrifying Trump Rallies Where Grandmas Shouted at...
NOT YOU! Pete Buttigieg Asks, 'Then What?' After Trump ... and He's Not...

WaPo Spin on SCOTUS Ruling Protecting Minors Is Chock-Full of the Usual 'Journalism'

meme

As we told you earlier, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that upholds the right of states to ban what the Left and much of the media calls "gender-affirming care." 

Advertisement

Our previous story contained the conclusion of the majority opinion, but if you missed that here it is

'This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field. The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound. The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements. Nor does it afford us license to decide them as we see best. Our role is not “to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic” of the law before us, Beach Communications, 508 U. S., at 313, but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment. Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is affirmed. 

It is so ordered.'

The public sentiment over so much of what's going on these days -- whether it's enforcing immigration laws or about the mutilation of minors -- are called "80-20 issues" for very good reason: 

Advertisement

However, the media continue to report these things as if it's a major source of contention within the U.S.

The Washington Post called the SCOTUS ruling a "polarizing national issue":

It is in no way a "polarizing national issue":

Also you'll notice the Trump administration has "seized" again, and the "pouncing" can't be far behind. 

Advertisement

Then there's the "divided" court. Yeah, about that:

It depends on what your definition of "divided" is.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement