Scott Jennings Has a New 'Title' for Hillary Clinton After She Claims October...
Kimmel Said Trump Appeared on His Show While Running for Office and That...
A RECKONING —> 9-11 Widow Goes Rogue Calling Out Islamic Terror for What...
Fairfax County Schools’ 9/11 Do’s and Don’ts for Teachers: Hide the Jihad and...
Lindsay Clancy Juror on CBS Mornings Describes the Lone Holdout and 'Gayle Sounds...
Elon Musk, Grok, and ALL of X Fact-Check TF Out of AOC Making...
Pink Slip Peggy: Michele Tafoya Calls Out Peggy Flanagan As Minnesota Race Tightens
John James CRUSHES Jocelyn Benson With Ad and Post Reminding Michigan Voters Who...
Killer Argument: Female Oprah Crowd Laments Black Women Can’t Get Away With Murdering...
Twerk of Art: Cartoonish Bronze ‘Everywoman’ Statue Is Unveiled (and Reviled) in London
Trial of Smiles?: Female Lindsay Clancy Jurors Share Laughs Over Court Antics of...
Socialism 2026 Talks Transfeminist Absolutionism and Communist Sex Forests
Rep. Rashida Tlaib Says Antony Blinken ‘Totally Waited’ and Did Nothing to Stop...
DHS Announces That 19-Year-Old High School Serial Groper Has Been Deported
Yesterday’s Call, Tomorrow’s Anniversary

Did Kamala Write This? Politico Says Harris' Early Lessons About the Border Are Paying Off Now

Twitter

Kamala Harris has received many media favors that basically count as in-kind campaign donations. One recent example is this TIME Magazine glowing profile that got more laughable after the story noted that the Democrat nominee denied their request for an interview:

Advertisement

Now why would somebody who's done such an amazing job and has popular positions on the issues need a "reintroduction"? 

Next up to try and help push Harris across the finish line before voters know too much about her is Politico. Interestingly enough, the story below, like the TIME cover piece, notes that the Harris campaign didn't respond to their request for comment. But why would Harris when she knows her campaign will get this kind of treatment? 

The Biden-Harris administration's efforts at the border are only "paying off" for smugglers and people entering the country illegally by the millions. But that's over the last nearly four years. The Politico piece would rather focus on a decade or more ago: 

With her recent support for tougher border enforcement, Vice President Kamala Harris is borrowing from a familiar playbook: her own. 

Harris’ vow to fight for border security has roots in her run for California attorney general in 2010, when she barely defeated a Republican opponent who had support across the state from police chiefs and prosecutors. 

Harris, a former prosecutor herself, decided to embrace a crackdown on the transnational gangs that smuggle drugs and people across the U.S.-Mexico border. She expanded a task force devoted to cross-border criminality — during the Great Recession, when the state was cutting its budget and eliminating programs — and fostered greater intelligence sharing with Mexican authorities that officials said yielded arrests years later. 

Her focus on the issue wasn’t unique for a border-state attorney general, but it marked a departure from the reform-minded profile she’d built earlier in her career and gave her common cause with law enforcement groups and others who had seen her as a liberal from the sanctuary city of San Francisco.

Advertisement

If Harris knows all about how to secure a border, why did she refuse to do any of it when she was working in the White House with Joe Biden and allowing people to enter the country illegally by the millions? Politico glossed over that part. 

Politico's headline could have been much shorter:

Exactly.

Yes, it's a joke, except not the "ha ha" kind, but the "journalism" kind.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement