Governor Tim Walz Encouraged Residents to Stalk and Harass ICE While Agent Was...
Dem Bennie Thompson: Kristi Noem Signaling to ICE Agents They Can Execute Citizens...
Jasmine Crockett’s Aides Try to Hide Her Quick Escape From Reporter With… Poster...
BREAKING: Another Officer-Involved Shooting In Minneapolis As ICE Agent Is Attacked
Wife, Family of Renee Good Hire Lawyer Who Represented George Floyd’s Family
Woman Calls for Liberals to Target ICE Agent in Her Neighborhood, Finds Out
David Frum Says Trump Allows Iranian Protesters to Die While Preparing to Kill...
TRIGGERED: Here's the Kind of Shrieking That ICE Agents Have to Put Up...
Independent Woman Ambassador Allie Coghan on Her Lawsuit and Greek Life Nightmare
Protester Says Officers Shot Him in the Face at Close Range With Non-Lethal...
Daily Beast Gloats Over 'Whistleblower’ Revealing Personal Data of ICE Agents in Data...
House Oversight Posts Audio and Video From Hillary Clinton's Deposition (When's the Arrest...
Bluesky Takes a Shot at X While Recognizing It as the 'Global Town...
Illegal Tries to Ram His Way Out of ICE Vehicle Blockade; One Officer...
Here's How Seriously ANOTHER Dem Takes Their Warning About Devastation Climate Change Will...

Barbra Streisand Unhappy SCOTUS Threatens 'Democracy' by Allowing Trump Due Process

Meme screenshot

Yesterday afternoon the Supreme Court threw a wrench in DC Special Counsel Jack Smith's attempt to ensure that Donald Trump's trial would occur before the 2024 November election. In other words, the Supreme Court wasn't going to enable Smith's attempt at election interference: 

Advertisement

The Supreme Court said Friday it will not immediately take up a plea by special counsel Jack Smith to rule on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted for his actions to overturn the 2020 election results.

The ruling is a scheduling win for Trump and his lawyers, who have sought repeatedly to delay the criminal cases against him as he campaigns to reclaim the White House in 2024. It averts a swift ruling from the nation’s highest court that could have definitively turned aside his claims of immunity, and it further throws into doubt the possibility of the landmark trial proceeding as scheduled on March 4. 

The issue will now be decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which has signaled it will act quickly to decide the case.

Lately, Barbra Streisand has been counted on to provide some ironic legal and economic analyses (she should start a law firm with Rob Reiner). Here's the latest from the singer/actress: The Supreme Court is threatening "democracy" by not denying Trump his constitutional rights so Democrats can have their show trial before the election:

Streisand doesn't want a Republican presidential candidate to have an appeals process so his trial can be rushed to affect the election, and TRUMP is the "threat to democracy"? It's simply incredible how these people aren't able to see the projection.

Advertisement

When the Left says "democracy" they mean "Democrats."

We can't wait to see how mad she is when SCOTUS strikes down the Colorado Supreme Court's recent ruling to throw Trump off that state's ballot.

*** 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement