Nate Silver Throws Shade on Allan Lichtman's 2024 Election Prediction
'A Slap in the Face': Border Patrol Union Statement on Kamala Harris' Border...
We Are LAUGHING: Iowahawk Roasts Hezbollah As Only He Can
Glenn Greenwald Points Out the Democrats Massive Hypocrisy Problem
Idiot FL Democrat Blames Hurricane Helene on Ron DeSantis Removing 'Climate Change' From...
And Then There Were NONE: IDF Told Israeli Media Hezbollah Leader Killed in...
ICE's Admission About Thousands of Illegals Released Into US Should END the Harris...
Pay Attention Kammy! Trump and Zelinsky Meet and HOT DAMN THIS Is What...
SPEAKS VOLUMES: White House Declines to Say If They'd Consider Iran Assassinating Trump...
He's Dead, Jim. DEAD! Giorgia Meloni Ends 'Little Macron' After He Tries Picking...
Electoral College Poll Has Me Wondering Just How Damn DUMB Far Too Many...
Trump Said Something During His Meeting With Zelenskyy That TRIGGERED Adam Schiff
All the OOF! Mollie Hemingway EMASCULATES 'Tampon' Tim Walz Explaining How He's Hurting...
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics: Joe Biden Repeats Phony Stat on Guns Being...
Zelensky for Harris?! Liberals BRAINWASH Their Kids!

Barbra Streisand Unhappy SCOTUS Threatens 'Democracy' by Allowing Trump Due Process

Meme screenshot

Yesterday afternoon the Supreme Court threw a wrench in DC Special Counsel Jack Smith's attempt to ensure that Donald Trump's trial would occur before the 2024 November election. In other words, the Supreme Court wasn't going to enable Smith's attempt at election interference: 

Advertisement

The Supreme Court said Friday it will not immediately take up a plea by special counsel Jack Smith to rule on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted for his actions to overturn the 2020 election results.

The ruling is a scheduling win for Trump and his lawyers, who have sought repeatedly to delay the criminal cases against him as he campaigns to reclaim the White House in 2024. It averts a swift ruling from the nation’s highest court that could have definitively turned aside his claims of immunity, and it further throws into doubt the possibility of the landmark trial proceeding as scheduled on March 4. 

The issue will now be decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which has signaled it will act quickly to decide the case.

Lately, Barbra Streisand has been counted on to provide some ironic legal and economic analyses (she should start a law firm with Rob Reiner). Here's the latest from the singer/actress: The Supreme Court is threatening "democracy" by not denying Trump his constitutional rights so Democrats can have their show trial before the election:

Streisand doesn't want a Republican presidential candidate to have an appeals process so his trial can be rushed to affect the election, and TRUMP is the "threat to democracy"? It's simply incredible how these people aren't able to see the projection.

Advertisement

When the Left says "democracy" they mean "Democrats."

We can't wait to see how mad she is when SCOTUS strikes down the Colorado Supreme Court's recent ruling to throw Trump off that state's ballot.

*** 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement