Attorney General Merrick Garland is testifying before the House Judiciary Committee today, and as expected the Democrats are trying to get Garland to confirm their narratives while Republicans are trying to get honest answers about... anything.
Here's one example:
QUESTION: "Have you had personal contact with anyone at the FBI headquarters about the Hunter Biden investigation?"
— House Republicans (@HouseGOP) September 20, 2023
[Long pause]
AG MERRICK GARLAND: "I don't recollect the answer to that question." pic.twitter.com/HSJoaksEJK
What does that mean? "Yes," most likely.
At another point, Garland made this claim:
Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland: "I am not the president's lawyer" pic.twitter.com/0G1AyMmVOb
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 20, 2023
Mollie Hemingway decided that needed to be translated, and here it is:
“Yes, I protect him and his family from investigation of their influence peddling scheme and I destroy norms by aggressively attempting to bankrupt and imprison his entire opposition party, but I wouldn’t say I’m his personal attorney, no.” https://t.co/0RFbb9Fyvt
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 20, 2023
Bingo!
It all depends on what you consider a "personal attorney" to be, and Garland clearly has a very narrow definition.
Garland's kindhearted-grandpa-who-just-wants-to-do-the-right-thing schtick is nauseating, knowing the kind of aggressively tyrannical department he’s running.
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 20, 2023
Nauseating and maddening.
***
Related:
'MORE GUN LAWS' Democrat lets AG Garland know Hunter Biden shouldn't have been charged
***
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member