Yesterday the Biden White House wanted to sound the alarm again about the existential threat that is posed by the burning of fossil fuels. How did they do that? By firing up Air Force One and having President Biden head to the Grand Canyon to explain how this administration is trying to "save the planet" (if anything they're doing precisely the opposite).
Biden then sat down for a super-challenging interview with... The Weather Channel. Biden was not asked about the Weather Channel's founder's thoughts about climate change.
Just a reminder that the late John Coleman, a co-founder of the Weather Channel, correctly thought "Climate Change"/global warming was a hoax. https://t.co/n1gpZrtmC4
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) August 8, 2023
On this same topic, John Stossel has a great interview with a researcher and former climate change alarmist who addressed the "consensus of scientists" argument often used by the likes of Al Gore, John Kerry, and the rest.
Watch:
The media insist a “scientific consensus” says climate change is a manmade crisis.
— John Stossel (@JohnStossel) August 8, 2023
“It’s a manufactured consensus,” researcher @curryja tells me.
Curry knows—she once spread alarm about climate change.
Now she reveals the nefarious ways “the science” is corrupted. pic.twitter.com/EHTN413Vv6
Researchers and scientists aren't heard from on mainstream outlets because they're ignored and attacked, not because they don't exist:
Scientist @curryja published research that fueled climate change alarmism.
— John Stossel (@JohnStossel) August 8, 2023
“I was...treated like a rock star."
Then she realized some of her research was wrong.
When she admitted it, the corrupt climate change industry attacked her.
Here she exposes how alarmism is REWARDED: pic.twitter.com/62ISCCvaGT
None of this will be too surprising to our regular readers but it's still incredible to hear about the dishonesty in much of the "science" community ("follow the money" as usual).
Recommended
"The consensus is so strong there shouldn't even be a debate."
— shovas (@shovas) August 8, 2023
It's when they start saying stuff like this that you know with the highest certainty that you need serious, vigorous debate.
Author Michael Crichton nailed it years ago:
Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.
***
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member