Another One? Nurse Says Hospitals Can’t Have MAGA Employees Treating Patients
Washington Post Journalists: Unburdened By What Has Been: Grammys Edition
Rural Areas Tasked With Finding Strategies to Make British Countryside 'Less White'
ABC News: Millions Could Lose SNAP Benefits as Work Requirements Take Effect
AWFL Thrilled to Take in Haitian Migrant — It's Like Having Your Own...
U-Haul Backed Up to the Open Door of the Quality Learing Center in...
Coached to Be Anti-ICE by Teachers, Preschoolers Hold Anti-ICE Rally at School
Woman Posts Video of Herself Kickboxing, Says It's Time to Start Training for...
Democrats Recreate Battle of Iwo Jima Flag Raising With Somali-Looking Minnesota Flag
WOMP WOMP: LAPD Says It Won’t Enforce Governor’s Mask Ban on Federal Agents
The Nation Nominates the City of Minneapolis for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
Anti-ICE Protesters in Minneapolis Blocking Roads, Checking IDs, and Running Plates
Adam Schiff Busted for His '1930s Germany' Post (Containing an Edit and ZERO...
Guy Benson Shares a Poll Showing Unhinged Dems Digging Their Own Grave on...
Not MESSING Around: Debra Messing TORCHES Zohran Mamdani for ATROCIOUS State of New...
Premium

Biden again claims your guns are no match against the govt's F-16s

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The liberal narrative about guns is absolutely amazing and shameless all at the same time. In one breath they refer to your semiautomatic rifle (or any other gun for that matter -- especially if it has the fearsome chainsaw bayonet attachment) as a "weapon of war" that is so dangerous many say they should be banned.

In one breath Biden et al try to indicate that "assault weapons" (the definition being whatever the libs want it to be on any given day) and in the next they try to diminish #2A supporters as nothing compared to the power of the government:

Isn’t this the same president who wants everybody to believe that on Jan. 6th the U.S. government was nearly overthrown by a band of “insurrectionists” led by an unarmed shaman wearing a buffalo hat? These people need to find one story and stick with it.

Biden was speaking at a campaign event in California, and I'm pretty sure that Dem Rep. Eric "nuke 'em" Swalwell was in full agreement with this one:

And so, we have to change — there’s a lot of things we can change, because the American people by and large agree you don’t need a weapon of war. I’m a Second Amendment guy. I taught it for four years, six years in law school. And guess what? It doesn’t say that you can own any weapon you want. It says there are certain weapons that you just can’t own. Even during when it was passed, you couldn’t own a cannon. You can’t own a machine gun. (Laughter.) No, I’m serious.


So what’s the deal with the idea that it’s an absolute — you know, I love these guys who say the Second Amendment is — you know, the tree of liberty is water with the blood of patriots. Well, if want to do that, you want to work against the government, you need an F-16. You need something else than just an AR-15. Anyway.

Earlier today it was pointed out to me that Biden conveniently left out something from his quote:

I'm not surprised Biden would leave that part out -- gee, I wonder why!?

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement