German World Cup Tourist Freddy Hits the Gun Range, Learns About Freedom (and...
Rob Schneider Declares Islamophobia Doesn’t Exist in Response to Proposed VA Legislation
Rep Says There Are So Many Homophobes in This Admin With 'Weird, Like,...
CNN's Brian Stelter Says CBS Is 'Prebunking' President Trump's Address
NBC News: Young Dad Working to Give His Daughter a Stable Life Killed...
Masked Woman at Mamdani Housing Event Declares That Eviction Equals Violence
Former Marine and Congressional Candidate Arrested After Saying Trump Must Be 'Killed'
CNN Legal Analyst Norm Eisen Flirts With Libel of Todd Blanche on Nicolle...
‘The Odyssey’s’ Bad Rap Gets Worse With a Cringe Cast Video That’s Giving...
New York Post: Sen Ruben Gallego Had Sexual Relationships With Two House Staffers
Pro-Illegal Alien Dem James Talarico Laughably Laments Biden ‘Failing to Secure Our Southe...
JD Vance Torches Thune For SAVE Act Stalling in Senate
Mic Drop Alert! Ex AG Reminds Adam Schiff That Hating Trump Does NOT...
TEE-HEE! Chuck Schumer's Reaction When Reporter Asks Him About Farting on the Floor...
Harvard Dolt Proposes Cutting a Deal With the Right to LET the Left's...
Premium

Biden again claims your guns are no match against the govt's F-16s

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The liberal narrative about guns is absolutely amazing and shameless all at the same time. In one breath they refer to your semiautomatic rifle (or any other gun for that matter -- especially if it has the fearsome chainsaw bayonet attachment) as a "weapon of war" that is so dangerous many say they should be banned.

In one breath Biden et al try to indicate that "assault weapons" (the definition being whatever the libs want it to be on any given day) and in the next they try to diminish #2A supporters as nothing compared to the power of the government:

Isn’t this the same president who wants everybody to believe that on Jan. 6th the U.S. government was nearly overthrown by a band of “insurrectionists” led by an unarmed shaman wearing a buffalo hat? These people need to find one story and stick with it.

Biden was speaking at a campaign event in California, and I'm pretty sure that Dem Rep. Eric "nuke 'em" Swalwell was in full agreement with this one:

And so, we have to change — there’s a lot of things we can change, because the American people by and large agree you don’t need a weapon of war. I’m a Second Amendment guy. I taught it for four years, six years in law school. And guess what? It doesn’t say that you can own any weapon you want. It says there are certain weapons that you just can’t own. Even during when it was passed, you couldn’t own a cannon. You can’t own a machine gun. (Laughter.) No, I’m serious.


So what’s the deal with the idea that it’s an absolute — you know, I love these guys who say the Second Amendment is — you know, the tree of liberty is water with the blood of patriots. Well, if want to do that, you want to work against the government, you need an F-16. You need something else than just an AR-15. Anyway.

Earlier today it was pointed out to me that Biden conveniently left out something from his quote:

I'm not surprised Biden would leave that part out -- gee, I wonder why!?

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement