Beyoncé and Jim-C: James Comey Says He Once Sang the Diva’s ‘Sandcastles’ During...
Dan Crenshaw Turns a Blind Eye to the Real Reasons for His Primary...
Jimmy Kimmel's Oscars' Swipe at 'Countries Whose Leaders Don't Support Free Speech' Was,...
Youth Travel Sports Have Become a Family-Destroying Trap – Thank God Someone Finally...
BREAKING: Bluesky's New Pitch: Come Over to Bluesky, You Will Be Glad to...
Maine Kampf: Platner Walks Back Apology for 'Nazi Skull' Tattoo, Calls It Eminently...
CNN's New Token Anti-Trump Republican: Marjorie Taylor Greene, Fresh Off Hating on the...
New York Times Heartbroken: Latin America Refuses to Keep Propping Up Castro's Eternal...
Jonathan Turley Rants Against the Shutdown
Fox News: Accused Synagogue Attacker Related to Hezbollah Commander
Seth Dillon DROPS Iranian-Sympathizing Nutball Tucker Carlson for Claiming He Tried Bribin...
LH Grey Goes OFF on Toads Who Doxxed Cynical Publius in Maybe the...
Who Wants to Tell Her? Dem Rep Shakes Her Fist at Trump REFUSING...
WATCH Cory Booker's Face As Jake Tapper Pushes Back on His Lie About...
So ... What's Going on Between Chris Murphy and Iran?
Premium

Biden again claims your guns are no match against the govt's F-16s

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The liberal narrative about guns is absolutely amazing and shameless all at the same time. In one breath they refer to your semiautomatic rifle (or any other gun for that matter -- especially if it has the fearsome chainsaw bayonet attachment) as a "weapon of war" that is so dangerous many say they should be banned.

In one breath Biden et al try to indicate that "assault weapons" (the definition being whatever the libs want it to be on any given day) and in the next they try to diminish #2A supporters as nothing compared to the power of the government:

Isn’t this the same president who wants everybody to believe that on Jan. 6th the U.S. government was nearly overthrown by a band of “insurrectionists” led by an unarmed shaman wearing a buffalo hat? These people need to find one story and stick with it.

Biden was speaking at a campaign event in California, and I'm pretty sure that Dem Rep. Eric "nuke 'em" Swalwell was in full agreement with this one:

And so, we have to change — there’s a lot of things we can change, because the American people by and large agree you don’t need a weapon of war. I’m a Second Amendment guy. I taught it for four years, six years in law school. And guess what? It doesn’t say that you can own any weapon you want. It says there are certain weapons that you just can’t own. Even during when it was passed, you couldn’t own a cannon. You can’t own a machine gun. (Laughter.) No, I’m serious.


So what’s the deal with the idea that it’s an absolute — you know, I love these guys who say the Second Amendment is — you know, the tree of liberty is water with the blood of patriots. Well, if want to do that, you want to work against the government, you need an F-16. You need something else than just an AR-15. Anyway.

Earlier today it was pointed out to me that Biden conveniently left out something from his quote:

I'm not surprised Biden would leave that part out -- gee, I wonder why!?

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement