From 'Elephants Are Not Birds' to 'Principles Are Not Permanent': Ashley St. Clair's...
From 'I'm Not a Biologist' to 'CisGINGER' Queen: KBJ Just Gave Redheads the...
Vigil Held for Father of Two Killed by Off-Duty ICE Agent
Don Lemon Asks If This Is What You Voted For, MAGA, You 'F**king...
Lee Zeldin Calls Out the Gaslighting New York Times For Fake Story About...
Leftist PA Brags About $200K and Degree — ICE Hero Responds: High School...
Crying Woman Shaves Her Head to Protest Shooting of 'Renee Cook'
Apartment Manager Arrested for Voting Multiple Times by Filing Ballots for Former Tenants
Justice Alito Corners ACLU: 'What Is a Man or Woman?' — They Had...
Dashcam Video Shows Anti-ICE Agitator Being ‘Run Over’ by Police
OOPS! Joy Reid Says the Quiet Part Out Loud In Insanely Racist Rant...
Pete Hegseth's Response to Mark Kelly Whining About 'Finding Out' (After He Eff'd...
WHOA: Epstein Files MUST Be DAMNING for Bill and Hillary Clinton to Ditch...
CNN Pours Cold Water on Pathetic Anti-ICE Lawsuit
Chain-Wearing Skeeze I've Never Heard of Made the Dumbest Comparison Between ICE and...

CNN's Jeffrey Toobin imagines America's dystopian future after SCOTUS struck down NY gun control law

As we told you earlier, there was a huge win for the 2nd Amendment after it was announced that the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, struck down a New York gun control law that required people to show “proper cause” to get a license to carry a handgun outside the home. The ruling will affect similar laws in several other states. The case was New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, over on CNN, legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin didn’t like the ruling at all. Toobin even made up things that weren’t even in the ruling to try and make the future sound scarier:

Wait, who said anything about getting rid of background checks? Toobin also seemed surprised that the majority on the Court had the audacity to consider the 2nd Amendment to be on par with all other Amendments.

THIS. Is CNN.

Advertisement

And what’s up with the “first-class rights” thing? Naturally libs like Toobin would like to be the ones to decide which constitutional rights are the “important” ones.

Right?

***

Related:

Ben Shapiro educates Piers Morgan on the Supreme Court works after today’s gun ruling

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement