RUH-ROH, RAGGY! Laura Ingraham Reports on the Possible REAL Reason Joe Kent Resigned
Hypocrisy Alert: Iranian Regime Bigwigs' Children Now Professors at Elite Unis Shaping Ame...
USAA: Founded for Veterans, Profiting Billions While Laying Off Americans and Importing H-...
Plum Crazy: Dem James Talarico Tells Jessica Tarlov That the Best Color for...
A Blockbuster Idea: Online Game Let’s Players Unwind and Rewind in a 1990s...
John Cleese Ridicules UN General Assembly President's International Day to Combat Islamoph...
US Surgeon Says Israel Bombed His Vacation Apartment in Beirut With Weapons Paid...
Newsom Press Office Crotch-Kicks Themselves Attempting to Own Critics of the Latest Calif....
CA Refugees and Asylum Seekers Will No Longer Be Eligible for CalFresh Food...
Frog of Shame Will Remain the People’s Option to X’s New Dislike Button
NYC's 'First Lady' Used N-Word, Praised Terrorist Hijacker, and Cheered Intifada in Dorman...
Sen. Mark Kelly Is Still Hassling Pete Hegseth About His ‘Illegal’ No Quarter...
Kat Abughazaleh's Opponent Hit With #MeToo Allegation on Eve of Dem Primary
John Brennan's Assessment of Tulsi Gabbard's Testimony Might Be the Least Self-Aware Thing...
Biden's Oval Office Bust Honored a Man Now Accused by NYT of Repeat...

WaPo fact-checker's ruling on if Biden 'repeatedly refused to condemn rioters over the summer' sparks some objections

During the Senate impeachment trial (which has now resulted in Trump’s acquittal), the former president’s lawyers showed plenty of video featuring Democrats urging their supporters to “fight like hell” as well as claims that Joe Biden said little to nothing in the way of denouncing the violence, rioting and looting that took place in many U.S. cities last spring and summer.

Advertisement

Washington Post fact-checker framed it this way in order to provide a “false” rating to such claims about Biden:

In typical “fact-checker” style, that’s framed in a way that’s easy to parse if necessary.

First of all, “refused to condemn” would imply that Biden was asked to condemn the rioting, and since Biden rarely took reporters’ questions — and when he did they were often the softest of softballs — that didn’t happen. But it certainly took a long time for Biden to say anything negative specifically about the riots in U.S. cities:

Advertisement

It was at the end of August last year, many weeks into unrest in the streets of U.S. cities, that CNN’s Don Lemon said the then Democrat nominee should speak out forcefully against the rioting. Why? Because it was hurting the Democrats’ poll numbers.

It was mentioned a grand total of zero times during the Democrat convention.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Biden’s running mate at the time did the exact opposite of “condemn”:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement