The New York Times is running a take on President Trump’s pick for director of national security by wondering if the nominee would soil the sanctity of what they say is a traditionally non-political arena in the Executive Branch:
Former officials have expressed concern that Representative John Ratcliffe, President Trump's pick to serve as director of national intelligence, will politicize what is supposed to be a nonpartisan job https://t.co/tNTVZTIhk6
— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) July 29, 2019
“Traditionally nonpartisan” eh? Brit Hume has two very short and somewhat rhetorical questions about that:
“Nonpartisan?” As in Clapper and Brennan? https://t.co/yyKIn87v4S
— Brit Hume (@brithume) July 30, 2019
LMAO! Right?
Brit just beat me to this tweet.
Regardless, he is correct. https://t.co/f9N9oxH9ul
— Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) July 30, 2019
Don’t forget “ONLY VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS” Comey ? https://t.co/yn4K5IEzNr
— Just A Girl ❤️ (@WrongWayRhonda) July 30, 2019
But in a “totally nonpartisan” kind of way. *Eye roll*
This right here is Twitter gold…lol https://t.co/MGh3oEry2o
— Larry Robidoux (@mrdsgrumpy) July 30, 2019
Only democrat presidents are allowed to appoint partisans
— Doug wilson (@Dougwil08943651) July 30, 2019
Truth burns them.
— Sandy (@RightGlockMom) July 30, 2019
Any “journalist” pretending certain leaders of the intel community under Obama weren’t “politicized” are not to be taken seriously.
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.