https://twitter.com/AngryAppalachia/status/719600685118013440
Hillary Clinton’s taken a new approach when it comes to presenting gun stats in order to attempt to pin crimes in New York on Bernie Sanders’ home state of Vermont:
Clinton: "The state that has the highest per capita number of those guns that end up committing crimes in NY come from Vermont."
— Abby D. Phillip (@abbydphillip) April 11, 2016
First of all:
"Guns that end up committing crimes" hahaha https://t.co/ScOBW048Hs
— Vicky (@lettuceflea) April 11, 2016
Also note the “guns that end up committing crimes” line. https://t.co/5Galhs1Ls4
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) April 11, 2016
https://twitter.com/Rickersam2/status/719596644317007872
Hillary better call for those guns to be thrown in jail!
Then there’s Clinton’s “per capita” approach:
is this true? I remember Bloomberg going after Va for this https://t.co/JYQO4TjpsB
— Greg Pollowitz (@GPollowitz) April 11, 2016
You don't have to be a mathematics major to know that this is a severe abuse of statistics. https://t.co/C4eMFtMTCA
— Michael Freeman (@michaelpfreeman) April 11, 2016
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/719595092810588160
Note the meaningless “per capita” filter, which she has to use to hit Sanders because without it this isn’t true. https://t.co/5Galhs1Ls4
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) April 11, 2016
Recommended
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/719592699486146560
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/719593217365319680
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/719595476190937088
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/719595872020008960
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/719597383223521281
@lachlan what a bizarre thing for her to say. NYT did a deep dive on this in the fall https://t.co/PsYqsXBPbh pic.twitter.com/runPaiJlLK
— Christopher Ingraham (@_cingraham) April 11, 2016
Try using maple-syrup production as the denominator and you'll get a very different result. https://t.co/NlLdShubZb
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) April 11, 2016
https://twitter.com/MustDeportTrump/status/719595819754790913
Even if that were true (which it isn't) it's a criminal act for a prohibited possessor to acquire from diff state https://t.co/rOUdICdIVZ
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 11, 2016
Never burden Hillary Clinton with the facts! She has no interest.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member