NY Times has 'first time evidence' about COVID origin (Fauci will appreciate it)

Doug P. | 12:24 PM on March 22, 2023

It’s been more than three years since COVID-19 first emerged. Coincidentally and just like magic, the media’s finding reporting “new evidence” just as some in the U.S. government admitted that the virus likely came from a Wuhan lab. This month Sen. Rand Paul tweeted about how his requests for information have been getting stonewalled:

It’s absolutely outrageous that I’ve sent over 25 letters to more than 8 federal agencies requesting documents related to COVID and received virtually nothing. I’ve also asked 4 Senate Democrat Committee Chairs to sign letters requesting these documents and so far none have.

— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) March 9, 2023

Now the New York Times is picking up its effort to help get Dr. Fauci and others out of a jam by trying to get the narrative back on the original “COVID came from an animal” narrative. Here’s this week’s spin:

In a report released on Monday, scientists described in detail for the first time evidence from a swab that they say strengthens the case that illegally traded wild animals ignited the coronavirus pandemic. https://t.co/oxyHlBeq4g

— The New York Times (@nytimes) March 22, 2023

My BS detector is overheating again:

On Jan. 12, 2020, Chinese investigators combing a market for clues about the outbreak of a mysterious new illness in the city of Wuhan swabbed a cart. It was the kind typically used for transporting animal cages, and it came back positive for the coronavirus.

Three years later, a team of international experts has sifted through the genetic contents of that swab, which were quietly uploaded to an international database and made public only this year. In a report released on Monday night, the scientists described in detail for the first time evidence from the swab that they say strengthens the case that illegally traded wild animals ignited the coronavirus pandemic.

I couldn’t help but wonder…

How much is China and Fauci paying the Times to repeatedly push this “for the first time” evidence? https://t.co/n7zTHkZ4At

— Doug Powers (@ThePowersThatBe) March 22, 2023

Call me skeptical but there’s something in it for the media to keep carrying Fauci and Xi’s water so aggressively.

The length a left leaning newspaper is willing to go justify how wrong Fauci was is incredible. It appears that this was the work of coordinated global elite whose plans failed.

— Noör (@NoorMAbdirahman) March 22, 2023

Isn’t it absolutely stunning to see the media go out of its way to run cover and try to save the original narrative even though it’s collapsing?