NC State House Candidate Posts That the Ovens at Dachau Are Where Trump...
Gavin Newsom, Abdul El-Sayed, Adam Schiff Scold DHS for Racist Post Featuring ‘Mr....
PERFECTION! Guess Who Rescued a Stranded Anti-Trump MS NOW Crew in the TX...
James Talarico Tells Jimmy Kimmel What Jesus Would Do If He Visited the...
Two Epstein 'Survivors' Kicked Out of the Republican Midterm Convention
Three Year Letterman Calls Out Canadian Troll Whose Visa Was ‘Pulled’ Over Vile...
New Video Shows the Harrowing ‘Attack’ on Ohio Gubernatorial Candidate Amy Acton
USA TODAY: Gen Z Leaving ‘Odd’ Posts About Charlie Kirk Using 'Humor' to...
COMMENTER Trying to Smear Lone Holdout Juror Upset That Megyn Kelly Called Her...
Talarico Said All His Donations Come From Texans (Kimmel of Course Did NOT...
Gov. Ron DeSantis Has an Offer for the Lone Holdout Clancy Juror Enduring...
End Wokeness Has Video of a Bunch of Democrats Doing Their Best Obama...
Abigail Spanberger Gets TORCHED on X for Claiming Americans 'Lost Their Lives' on...
Did the AP Not Want to Completely Ruin AOC's Narrative by Leaving Something...
The Difference Between How NBC Boston Covers 11 Jurors vs. the Holdout Is...

Glenn Greenwald finds Washington Post's current handling of imploded Steele dossier reporting 'absolutely bizarre'

The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple has for many months been upfront in asking the paper to come clean about their egregiously bad reporting on the Steele dossier. We noted a couple of days ago that the Post has gone as far as to add a disclaimer of sorts to their story about the indictment of Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who worked on the dossier. The Post’s story on the arrest concludes this way:

Advertisement

The Post continues to try and work their way through without making any retractions, which Wemple says might be necessary:

Journalist Glenn Greenwald goes through what seems to be unfolding, starting with Wemple explaining why retractions might be necessary:

A media critic attempting to get comment from his own paper but to no avail just sums it all up perfectly:

Advertisement

They’re just hoping it all goes away. How very “journalism” of them.

LOL! If anything it’ll be buried inside the paper and in the smallest print possible.

***

Related:

WaPo fact-checker says Durham’s ‘stunning indictment’ means ‘Christopher Steele’s sources were really bad’ (then it gets awkward)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement