Shooting Outside High School Football Game in Minnesota Blamed on Somali Gangs
Amy Siskind Wants All 57 Men in Cornell Fraternity’s Group Chat Investigated and...
Extreme or Extremely Funny? Steve Hilton ‘Lesbian’ Campaign Ad Is Rubbing Some Voters...
Ro Khanna Can't Believe Vance Would Go So Low As to Tell a...
Bill Maher Roasts Hack Media Over Reports of an Argument in the Cockpit...
TMZ: Christa Pike Donated Her Last Meal Money to Buy Pizza for the...
Steve Hilton Couldn't Help but Notice What Susan Rice's Demand About Xavier Becerra...
This Explosive Headline Is a Lock for First-Ballot Induction Into the 'TDS Hall...
The Evolution of the Dems' 'Noncitizen Voting Never Happens' to This Judge's Ruling...
Hot Take on The View: Biden Might Still Be President If Dems/Media Had...
School Is in Session! Tom Homan Teaches 'Deportation 101' to Reporter Pushing Dem...
Lyin’ Witch and the Wardrobe: Dem Peggy Flanagan Is Struck Fashion Senseless in...
Triggered by Vigor: CNN’s Kasie Hunt Questioned Trump’s Health but Time Reporter Shot...
Hilarious 'Hijacking Attempt Thwarted, Medhi Hassan Hardest Hit' Memes
No Mixed Signals Here: Hegseth Makes His Military Standards Crystal Clear (WATCH)

Glenn Greenwald finds Washington Post's current handling of imploded Steele dossier reporting 'absolutely bizarre'

The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple has for many months been upfront in asking the paper to come clean about their egregiously bad reporting on the Steele dossier. We noted a couple of days ago that the Post has gone as far as to add a disclaimer of sorts to their story about the indictment of Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who worked on the dossier. The Post’s story on the arrest concludes this way:

Advertisement

The Post continues to try and work their way through without making any retractions, which Wemple says might be necessary:

Journalist Glenn Greenwald goes through what seems to be unfolding, starting with Wemple explaining why retractions might be necessary:

A media critic attempting to get comment from his own paper but to no avail just sums it all up perfectly:

Advertisement

They’re just hoping it all goes away. How very “journalism” of them.

LOL! If anything it’ll be buried inside the paper and in the smallest print possible.

***

Related:

WaPo fact-checker says Durham’s ‘stunning indictment’ means ‘Christopher Steele’s sources were really bad’ (then it gets awkward)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement