Boom! Brit Hume Obliterates Media (and Dem) Narrative That US Is Losing in...
Catherine Rampell Finds Downside to Barring Illegal Truck Drivers
Permanently Broken: Canada Lights Up CN Tower For ... 'Long COVID Awareness Day'?
Conan O’Brien Jokes That at Least in Britain, They Arrest Their Pedophiles
TIME Lists Some of the Ways the Operation Epic Fury Money Could Have...
Cesar Chavez Too 'Problematic' Even for the Left? UFW Ditches Founder Amid Sexual...
Proposed Rule Could Ban Trump From Major International Events, Including the Olympics
Warner Goes From Calling Kent Dangerous to High-Fiving His Resignation – TDS Strikes...
Hearing a 27-Year-Old Mom Say She Feels Nothing for Her Baby Broke Me—Because...
Cato Director: Immigrants Reduce Crime Rates, So You’re Less Likely to Be a...
Talarico Goes Full Vegan: Because Nothing Screams 'Elect Me' Like Banning Brisket in...
California’s First Partner Says Don’t Listen to Bullies Like President Trump
Fairfax Schools Releases Worthless Statement Regarding Illegal Who Groped a Dozen Girls
Governor Newsom's Press Office Gets Ratioed INTO THE SUN by Nick Shirley (and...
Ireland’s New President Says ‘Patrick’ Reminds Us of the Courage and Resilience of...

Glenn Greenwald finds Washington Post's current handling of imploded Steele dossier reporting 'absolutely bizarre'

The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple has for many months been upfront in asking the paper to come clean about their egregiously bad reporting on the Steele dossier. We noted a couple of days ago that the Post has gone as far as to add a disclaimer of sorts to their story about the indictment of Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who worked on the dossier. The Post’s story on the arrest concludes this way:

Advertisement

The Post continues to try and work their way through without making any retractions, which Wemple says might be necessary:

Journalist Glenn Greenwald goes through what seems to be unfolding, starting with Wemple explaining why retractions might be necessary:

A media critic attempting to get comment from his own paper but to no avail just sums it all up perfectly:

Advertisement

They’re just hoping it all goes away. How very “journalism” of them.

LOL! If anything it’ll be buried inside the paper and in the smallest print possible.

***

Related:

WaPo fact-checker says Durham’s ‘stunning indictment’ means ‘Christopher Steele’s sources were really bad’ (then it gets awkward)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement