On the man-made climate change debate, Time Magazine is leading the way for the Left in how to debate the issue, and their strategy is “don’t”:
"This issue, if civilization can get its act together, might just mark a midpoint in TIME’s coverage of the biggest crisis facing our planet," writes TIME's Editor-in-Chief @efelsenthal https://t.co/X19uWjCvKC
— TIME (@TIME) September 12, 2019
Extra proud to work at @TIME today. We always aim to present both sides of every issue, but there are not two sides to climate change: It’s happening, it could destroy our planet, and here’s our special issue all about what we can do about it: https://t.co/NGS8P5cC4H
— Charlotte Alter (@CharlotteAlter) September 12, 2019
My boss @efelsenthal on why you won’t find climate change skeptics in our special @TIME double issue. There are not two sides to this. pic.twitter.com/AKAm3qfFci
— Charlotte Alter (@CharlotteAlter) September 12, 2019
TIME is coming out with a climate issue of the magazine on Thursday. "What you will NOT find in this issue are climate-change skeptics," @efelsenthal says ?? pic.twitter.com/iwoz8RvZHx
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) September 12, 2019
“Assume you’re correct and ignore detractors” doesn’t seem super-science-y, but what do we know?
TIME’s editor in chief, Edward Felsenthal, is boasting that their upcoming global warming issue only presents one side of the issue (via @brianstelter’s newsletter) pic.twitter.com/z6wGz2oFNw
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 12, 2019
They really think “the science is settled” is a scientific argument:
Time Mag’s @efelsenthal & MSNBC’s @SRuhle — both ostensibly objective reports — agree: No sense reporting on climate science’s dissenting voices
Felstenthal: “It’s settled”
Ruhle: “There is no debate” pic.twitter.com/HOvYmkNCDy
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 12, 2019
If you can’t beat ’em, ignore ’em!
The thing that annoys me about this isn't their reluctance to run pieces saying Climate Change is a hoax. It's their assumption that any challenge to studies or data on Climate Change amounts to a challenge to its very reality, rather than its deductions, its predictions, etc 1/2 https://t.co/kV4GQPKxoh
— pneumataster (@neontaster) September 12, 2019
It just floors me that this community is dismissive about challenges to the accuracy of scientific data or the conclusions drawn from it because because "meh, we know its real so why squabble over the minor details?" 2/2
— pneumataster (@neontaster) September 12, 2019
TIME is no longer a "news" magazine. Like much of the rest of the media, they're openly advocates for Left Wing politics and policies. https://t.co/5V6zfkv5gV
— Fusilli Spock (@awstar11) September 12, 2019
Maybe this calls for another day trip for some beers:
— BT (@back_ttys) September 12, 2019
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.