It’s been a banner day on the op-ed pages in a couple of the country’s biggest newspapers. First the Washington Post published a column warning Trump’s family, staffers and other supporters about the new rules for Resistance in restaurants, and now the writer of a New York Times op-ed is calling for journalists and others to help publicly shame and/or harass border agents:
If you've ripped a child out of her father's arms, the entire congregation should know about it when you show up at church on Sunday, writes @kcroninfurman https://t.co/7qiiKYFkCb
— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) June 29, 2019
And get a load of this:
Hooooo boy https://t.co/JgIu0dqGez pic.twitter.com/FF9Z6QyuMm
— Allahpundit (@allahpundit) June 29, 2019
It’s “not argument for doxxing”?
“This is not an argument for doxxing” they wrote right after making an argument for doxxing. https://t.co/mbKTW6KcCC
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) June 29, 2019
“This isn’t an argument for doxxing, BUT…”
"This is not an argument for doxxing" they write as they argue for doxxing Border Patrol agents. https://t.co/AuaGFGhvdd
— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) June 29, 2019
They are the same agents, doing the same work, under the same policies & in the same facilities as they did under Barack Obama. So this had zero to do with what they do. It has everything to do with who is President.
— Stacey (@ScotsFyre) June 29, 2019
Recommended
Bingo.
The names of agents Obama had putting kids in cages were never fair game. Or his people that were drone striking weddings. Or Hillary's staffers that turned Honduras into a warzone kicking off the migrant crisis.
Wanna know why? Because journos are all Dem operatives now. https://t.co/ybyEDom8Vr
— Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) June 29, 2019
Is there any other way to see it?
New York Times publishes oped calling for the harassment and doxing of everyone involved in immigration enforcement https://t.co/HrMZCkPIwM pic.twitter.com/rYm7BV3woi
— Scott Greer (@ScottMGreer) June 29, 2019
(This is absolutely an argument for doxxing)
— [shrug emoji] (@jtLOL) June 29, 2019
Narrator: It was, in fact, an argument for doxxing
— Password is Taco (@pw_is_taco1) June 29, 2019
Doxxing law enforcement to own the cons. What could go wrong?
— learntherules (@HummertPaul) June 29, 2019
So the New York Times supports doxxing. Good to know.
— Azimuth (@AzimuthBarnum) June 29, 2019
Reminder that the left wants normal people defending the country destroyed. https://t.co/KEmeMqpV9T
— JT (@jaytrenary) June 29, 2019
The @nytimes just keeps making Trump's argument for him. https://t.co/faQbSzi1N0
— Daniel Bobke (@DanielBobke) June 29, 2019
Now imagine the NYT saying this about abortionists and clinic workers and all who work for Planned Parenthood. Even given the horror of abortion, we pro lifers have never considered this. This is the left now. Be prepared. https://t.co/2fY3D5XF4E
— Kathleen McKinley (@KatMcKinley) June 29, 2019
It’s gotten out of control.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member