C-SPAN’s Washington Journal ran a poll over the weekend, and here’s how it’s worded:
Would you pay more in taxes in exchange for free education & health care?
Call, tweet or comment your thoughts now: https://t.co/Ex3jebVa8f
— Washington Journal (@cspanwj) June 16, 2019
You know, something just doesn’t add up with how that’s worded:
If you're paying more…it isn't free. 🙄 pic.twitter.com/5n3sV3i9fa
— Liberty Doll (@TheLibertyDoll) June 17, 2019
Wait, is “free” not really “free”? Shocker!
Um … if it is "FREE" then why would I have to "pay more in taxes"? That is not how FREE works people https://t.co/GlbaHxZAsa
— Miami Conservative (@MiamiConserv) June 16, 2019
Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and other Dems appreciate anybody who doesn’t understand that.
C-SPAN: "Would you *pay more* taxes for *free* education & health care?"
You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means. https://t.co/uSdCpcJyUn
— Jeff Lyons (@_JPLiberty) June 17, 2019
Ehrm….taxes followed by “in exchange for free…”? I feel like there’s an oxymoron in there somewhere. 🤔 https://t.co/eUuZNYCLqo
— RyFi (@RyFi13) June 16, 2019
— Pixie 🇺🇸 SS ☕️🍾 (@pixiejss) June 16, 2019
How do people really NOT get this?!
— Vice82 (@Vice82) June 17, 2019
And yet, those who use it in their “plans” seem to get plenty of support, as evidenced by the fact that over half of respondents answered “yes” to the question.