It’s been over a year since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election, but the scapegoats continue to be named:
Hillary Clinton: Obama's record made it hard to run as an "agent of change" https://t.co/nixqoEiZe9 pic.twitter.com/EVARLcyaCI
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) November 25, 2017
That’s another gem from Clinton’s interview with conservative talk host Hugh Hewitt:
“It is true that when you run to succeed a two-term president of your own party, you have a historical headwind blowing against you,” Clinton told radio host Hugh Hewitt. “It’s not just this campaign can be set apart from everything that’s ever happened in our politics. It is a challenge.”
“If you are both the candidate defending a lot of the areas of agreement, but also putting forth an agenda for change, which is what I tried to do, it is often difficult to get the second part of that message through,” she added. “So I do think it was a problem.”
In other words, campaigning as a “change” candidate seeking to succeed a “change” candidate she endorsed and worked for might have been an ill-advised approach? But of course it’s somebody else’s fault. Re-confirmed:
There is no one she will not blame. https://t.co/a6wMyNyK5l
— Bob ن (@BobHicks_) November 25, 2017
Recommended
https://twitter.com/SpankCityHall/status/934388285186682880
With the possible exception of somebody named “Hillary Clinton.”
Hard to be an agent of change if you agreed with his failed policies.
— Skip Russo (@BocaSkip) November 25, 2017
Her campaign really didn’t think that one through.
***
Related:
BWA-HA-HA! Guess what Hillary Clinton sees as cybersecurity gold standard
Just SAD: Hillary Clinton FINALLY gets a chance to be president (on ‘Earth 2’)
Bada-BAM! Hillary doesn’t know why 2020 candidates aren’t asking her advice, James Woods NAILS it
Join the conversation as a VIP Member