'What a Monster'! NY Times Shredded Again for Spin on What Trump's Christmas...
ANOTHER Rhode Island Dem Tried Playing the 'Do You Know Who I Am'...
WOW: Minnesota Lt Governor Peggy Flanagan Takes Somali-PANDERING to a Whole New Level...
Lefties Sink to Sick, New Low Sexualizing Eight-Year-Old on Christmas to Attack Trump
ABC News Reports Trump Has Ruined These Illegals Aliens' American Dreams (During the...
He No Grammar GOOD: Hakeem Jeffries' Attempt at Shaming Repubs Who 'COULD' Care...
AMEN! Robby Starbuck Drops BIBLICAL Fact-Check on Eric Swalwell for Exploiting Christmas t...
The American Have It COMING? Ann Coulter NUKES the NYT for Shameful Headline...
HA! Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons to Explain What ILLEGAL Means...
Merry Christmas to All Including the Dead Terrorists: U.S. Airstrikes Target ISIS in...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
ProPublica: Expectant Mother Forced to Eat Clay and Charcoal Due to US Aid...
City of Minneapolis Says Plans for George Floyd Square Are Moving Forward
John Pavlovitz: Christians Who ‘Weaponize’ Christmas Are an Insult to Jesus
ABC News: Glaciers Could Disappear in Coming Decades, According to 'New Research'

Now the Constitution Is Dangerous and We Need a New One

Twitchy

We're old enough to remember when President Barack Obama admitted that he wanted gun control, but he was "constrained" by the Constitution. At the Democratic National Convention, Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson said that we need to "reimagine" democracy as something "more revolutionary than what our founders put down on that little piece of paper." Just yesterday, MSNBC's Chris Hayes said the Electoral College was "a national suicide pact."

Advertisement

The Constitution sure keeps getting in the way of what Democrats want to do. That's why it's not surprising that the New York Times is entertaining the idea that the Constitution is dangerous.

Jennifer Szalai writes in a review of USC Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky's new book, "No Democracy Lasts Forever":

Originalists, as these scholars call themselves, say they are simply reacting to decades of “overreach” by “activist” judges. Liberal critics counter that interpreting the law according to what the founders (supposedly) wanted amounts to an end run around protecting and promoting a multiracial democracy. The attorney and columnist Madiba K. Dennie argues that originalists’ canny use of apolitical language ensnares liberals into treating originalism as coherent jurisprudence, even when it functions more like an “ideology.” Far from encouraging “judicial restraint,” she writes in “The Originalism Trap,” originalism is much more effective in “restraining judges from doing good things.”

Advertisement

Define "good things."

Chemerinsky stopped by MSNBC's "Morning Joe" to promote his book and argue that America needs a new Constitution:

"… is undermining democracy."

This is the dean of Berkeley's law school.

Advertisement

Excellent point.

You're probably not getting your way 100 percent of the time.

Advertisement

This is another one of those issues that's become partisan. You never hear Republicans calling for a "reimagining" of the Constitution; it's always Democrats who want to scrap all the founding documents and start from scratch (to enshrine Marxism).

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement