Dem Dropout: Scott Jennings Brutally Reminds Mallory McMorrow That Disavowing Hasan Piker...
Devlin on Trial: Juror Says Pro-Lindsay Clancy Women on Panel Had Ulterior Motive...
Propaganda Playbook: Jimmy Kimmel and James Talarico Dust Off Old Colbert Script for...
The Resistance, Distilled: Man Attacks a Doll Because JK Rowling Still Won’t Pretend...
On the 25th Anniversary of 9/11, Treacherous Duo Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib...
WI 'Political' Journo Deletes UGLY Posts About Tom Tiffany's Emergency Water Landing (Got...
Sen. Ron Johnson Brings Further Evidence of Virus Cover-Up
'Birthing Person' Jones Tried to Smear XX-XY's Jennifer Sey and It Was a...
DeSantis Comments on Suggestion of Democrat AI Oversight
Hasan Piker: El-Sayed’s Heartfelt 9/11 Tribute Was Scripted Because He ‘Can’t Say the...
Abdul El-Sayed Needed Hasan Piker for His Senate Primary ... Now He Has...
Hasan Piker Was 10 on 9/11 ... He Still Claims Mocking It Is...
Pete Buttigieg’s Fix for a ‘Nakedly Partisan’ Court: Add Six Seats and Hope...
Lindsay Clancy's Attorneys’ Wife Has a Big Mouth and Says LOTS of Stupid...
Drunk or Just NUTS? YOU Decide! CEO Brutally Calls Amy Acton OUT Over...

Now the Constitution Is Dangerous and We Need a New One

Twitchy

We're old enough to remember when President Barack Obama admitted that he wanted gun control, but he was "constrained" by the Constitution. At the Democratic National Convention, Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson said that we need to "reimagine" democracy as something "more revolutionary than what our founders put down on that little piece of paper." Just yesterday, MSNBC's Chris Hayes said the Electoral College was "a national suicide pact."

Advertisement

The Constitution sure keeps getting in the way of what Democrats want to do. That's why it's not surprising that the New York Times is entertaining the idea that the Constitution is dangerous.

Jennifer Szalai writes in a review of USC Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky's new book, "No Democracy Lasts Forever":

Originalists, as these scholars call themselves, say they are simply reacting to decades of “overreach” by “activist” judges. Liberal critics counter that interpreting the law according to what the founders (supposedly) wanted amounts to an end run around protecting and promoting a multiracial democracy. The attorney and columnist Madiba K. Dennie argues that originalists’ canny use of apolitical language ensnares liberals into treating originalism as coherent jurisprudence, even when it functions more like an “ideology.” Far from encouraging “judicial restraint,” she writes in “The Originalism Trap,” originalism is much more effective in “restraining judges from doing good things.”

Advertisement

Define "good things."

Chemerinsky stopped by MSNBC's "Morning Joe" to promote his book and argue that America needs a new Constitution:

"… is undermining democracy."

This is the dean of Berkeley's law school.

Advertisement

Excellent point.

You're probably not getting your way 100 percent of the time.

Advertisement

This is another one of those issues that's become partisan. You never hear Republicans calling for a "reimagining" of the Constitution; it's always Democrats who want to scrap all the founding documents and start from scratch (to enshrine Marxism).

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement