Trump's Best Strategy to Tackle Questions about the Ohio Immigration Crisis
WATCH: Deliberate or Dementia? Biden puts on … a Trump Hat?! (UPDATE: More...
Ben Collins Reminds Us That Haitians Have Made Springfield, Ohio Awesome
Alexander Vindman Reminds Senile Trump That Russia Was at War With Ukraine During...
CNN Analyst Says Trump Showed His Racism and Senility in a Single Word
The NAACP Joins with Other Lying Liars Who Lie and Claim Late Term...
Chris Wallace: ABC Debate as Devastating to Trump as CNN’s Was to Biden
AP Desperately Shields Non-Profits 'Settling' Haitians, but OilfieldRando Sees Through the...
Axios: Those Venezuelan Gang Rumors Are Unfounded
Jeffrey Toobin Says ABC Moderators Mastered the Debate
Glenn Kessler Thinks ABC’s Moderators Were a Model for Future Debates
OTTER NIGHTMARE! Malaysian Jogger Attacked by Roving Romp of Vicious Water Weasels
AP Accidentally Puts Abortion Debate to Bed With Story About Uptick in Tubal...
New Yorker Does a Piece on Donald Trump's 'Too-Crazy Moment' at the Debate
HOW CONVENIENT: Widespread Problems With USPS Could Disrupt Mail-in Voting

Kamala Harris Visits Gas Station Being Sued by the Biden-Harris Administration

Meme/Twitchy

As we pointed out earlier Monday, Vice President Kamala Harris, Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, and Vice Presidential candidate Tim Walz stopped off at a Sheetz convenience store to pick up some snacks, although there won't be as many Doritos in that bag Walz picked out thanks to corporate greed and "shrinkflation," another scam big businesses started along with Biden's inauguration.

Advertisement

David J. Urban noted that things were a bit awkward, seeing as the Biden-Harris administration is suing Sheetz for violating the Civil Rights Act.

Salena Zito reported for the Washington Examiner in April that Joe Biden had visited a Sheetz as well despite their criminal wrongdoing.

Just one day after the president’s orchestrated Sheetz run, the Biden administration hit the privately held convenience store chain with a federal lawsuit in which federal officials say the company discriminated against minority job applicants. The theory, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, is that because the company uses criminal background checks to screen job seekers, somehow that’s a violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

The Civil Rights Act prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, and national origin. EEOC attorney Debra M. Lawrence wrote that criminal background checks “cause a disparate impact because of race or other protected classifications.”

Lawrence went on to say the employment hiring practices must be shown by the employer to be necessary to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the particular jobs at issue.

“Even when such necessity is proven, the practice remains unlawful if there is an alternative practice available that is comparably effective in achieving the employer’s goals but causes less discriminatory effect,” Lawrence added. The suit said Sheetz discriminated against black, Native American, and multiracial job seekers by weeding out applicants who failed a criminal background check.

Advertisement

That sounds pretty typical.

Discriminating against black, Native American, and multiracial job seekers by requiring criminal background checks. That doesn't sound racist at all.

How much were those Doritos? Is Sheetz involved in price gouging too? Maybe Harris just paid what she thought customers should pay.

Advertisement

Couldn't they have stopped at a Wawa instead, or someplace they're not suing?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement