‘What Is the Point of You?’ Episcopal Priest Tells Dying Man She Has...
Rep. Ilhan Omar's Make ICE Pay Act Would Divert $140 Billion to Communities...
Pete Hegseth Says WaPo’s Middle East Death Toll Is Fake News
While Leftists Attack Billionaires, Elon's Implant Lets an ALS Patient Tell His Wife...
CA Attorney General Seeks 'Independent Content Monitoring of CNN' Under Paramount Merger
Unglued Awakening: Jessica Tarlov Shocked to Learn Conservatives Treat Her Better Than Far...
Lady Gaga Had a Baby at a Great Hospital — ‘Free Palestine’ Losers...
Program to Help Businesses Hurt by Operation Metro Surge Shut Down Due to...
Gas Prices Hurt and Sneering at Working Families Doesn’t Help
Kaitlan Collins Calls CNN White House Ban an ‘Illegal Assault’ on Their Constitutional...
Abdul El-Sayed Got Heightmogged by an Average Sized Female State Rep. and Became...
Jessica Tarlov Saying Dems Are on the Side of Sanity Nearly Made Bill...
Good Samaritan Tells Reporter Near the White House How CNN Can Get Its...
Converse-Troversy! Washington Post Tries to 'Sneak' in Some Race Rage Over Shoe Ad
Remember When Brian Stelter Asked If Fox News Should Lose WH Access and...
Premium

Sam Stein Praises Bulwark’s Sober Analysis of Those Stolen Valor Claims

AP Photo/Matt Rourke

I guess Sam Stein works for The Bulwark now, so of course he thinks that their "Six Things to Know About Tim Walz's 'Stolen Valor' Claims" is sober, comprehensive, and very important. At first, I was skeptical of the claims of stolen valor — they were flying thick and fast, from no less than J.D. Vance himself. Maybe Walz retired from the Army National Guard to run for Congress before he knew his unit was going to be deployed to Iraq. But as I've since learned, you need to think that a lot of people who served with Walz are lying in order to believe his story. I mean, the Minnesota Military Veterans Museum claims that Walz stood "on the tarmac at Bagram Air Base in Iraq." So which was it … was he in Iraq or in Afghanistan? It's clear now that he was deployed to neither one, although you wouldn't know that by asking him about his combat experience.

All right, Bulwark. You're up. Let's hear it. Will Selber writes:

1. This story is still evolving.

Although Walz has been in elected office for a long time—a dozen years in Congress followed by five years as the chief executive of Minnesota—the level of scrutiny his reputation will face over the next three months is more intense than anything he previously faced.

More attention than ever before will be paid to Walz’s verbal or written inaccuracies, both old and new. A slip of the tongue? A mistake in a moment of forgetfulness? A lost form, or one filled out wrong? An exaggeration while telling a story? A major pattern of long-term deception? You can expect any of these to be dug up and to be treated by his political opponents as devastating and disqualifying.

Why is it still evolving? How long does it take to tell the truth?

This video appeared Tuesday:

Here's tough-talking political strategist Rachel Bitecofer:

It's true … at least John Kerry went to Vietnam. What he did with his medals is certainly fictional, though.

They're not going to let us swift boat Walz? Then what are they doing about it besides publishing pieces about how the story is "still evolving." Walz could call a press conference at any time and clear up those slips of the tongue, mistakes in a moment of forgetfulness, lost forms, or one filled out wrong, and an exaggeration while telling a story.

But Harris and Walz don't do press conferences. Harris hopes her team can put together a sit-down interview sometime before the end of the month (it's the 13th).

I never served in the armed forces, and that's something I regret now — I wish I had. So I don't know all of the intricacies of an E8 versus an E9. But I've tried to give Walz the benefit of the doubt and again, you'd have to call just about everyone he served with a liar for his version of events to be true. 

It would be so easy to clear up.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos