The libs always get mad when you point out that women are being erased on behalf of the trans rights movement. But seriously, look at the names they’ve come up with to replace “woman”: menstruator and vulva owner are two of our favorites.
Cambridge Dictionary has a new definition for women, and a woman can be any adult, male or female or both or neither.
Cambridge Dictionary just dropped a new definition of "woman." pic.twitter.com/qDb17DJP5H
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) December 12, 2022
They’re teaching first-graders that the doctor makes a “guess” as to a baby’s sex when it’s delivered, and sometimes the doctor guesses wrong.
Definition of “man” is also out: pic.twitter.com/RCbwc5WZ64
— Diana Glebova (@DianaGlebova) December 12, 2022
Sorry, still not playing along.
— Deb Heine, Dissident (@NiceDeb) December 12, 2022
Still not playing. Out curiosity did they also redefine man?
— Stacey – Restorationist (@ScotsFyre) December 12, 2022
Ceding linguistic territory to the radical Left. What could go wrong?
— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) December 12, 2022
Here is their definition of "Female." Completely circular.
Take that @MattWalshBlog pic.twitter.com/kw65cPrh8b
— Curtis Johnson (@cjohnson999) December 12, 2022
The first two examples are men.
— Maud Maron (@MaudMaron) December 12, 2022
Gee, I wonder what could possibly cause you to be “assigned male”?
— Commenter51 (@Commenter51) December 12, 2022
Recommended
At least they don't say "assigned" 🤡
— Nicolás Miari (@nicolasmiari) December 12, 2022
Cambridge Dictionary decided it's no longer aligned with reality.
— just another George. (@Raku________) December 12, 2022
This is why physical books are so important.
— Mark Reeder (@MarkReederphoto) December 12, 2022
Save your old dictionaries
— Gulag Thought Crime Prevention Center (@GulagPc) December 12, 2022
So Cambridge dictionary just positioned themselves as science-challenged. Odd stance for a reference book.
— SnakeyesDVM (@SnakeyesDVM) December 12, 2022
This is what comes of the insistence that meaning is determined by usage. There is no such thing as secure/permanent non-usage. It gives all power to the language-changers.
— Alana.K.Asby (@Alana_K_Asby) December 12, 2022
What is the purpose of the word "trans" in the first example sentence?
— The Streeter (@thestreeter) December 12, 2022
If trans women are women, they should just say women. Unless, of course, they’re referring to females, in which case they’re cis women.
Where are the feminists?
— Number 24601 (@karndogs) December 12, 2022
I am so sick of this. People need to take the narrative back. Calling out the perpetrators of this nonsense, boycotting the companies that promote it, etc. It makes a difference.
— Tina.. (@tallytina27) December 12, 2022
We’re wondering exactly when the definition of woman became pliable. It’s obvious the language has changed now, when did it start? It had to have been universities where “woman” became whatever you wanted it to be. And those people have won … the dictionaries are now declaring them the winners. How did this minority manage to rewrite the language for an entire nation? Probably by shaming those who didn’t comply as “haters” and “bigots.”
***
Related:
J.K. Rowling putting her money where her mouth is. https://t.co/f7kywnOWkJ
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) December 12, 2022
Join the conversation as a VIP Member