Ditching Democracy: Scott Jennings Reminds CNN Hosts Dems Picking Power Over People to...
Scare Tactics: MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Agreed With Graham Platner That ‘Scandals’ Were...
Totally Hitlarious: Chris Murphy Worries About Dem Party’s Credibility If Platner Isn’t Pr...
Bernie’s Journey: A Vast Distance Separates Sanders’ Reactions to Brett Kavanaugh and...
The Odyssey Backlash Is 'Transphobia and Racism' Under the Guise of Historical Accuracy
Old Audio Casts Doubts on Abdul El-Sayed’s Claim He Never Called to Defund...
Pearl-Clutching Grifters: Bulwark's Fake Platner Skepticism Exposed
Politico Correspondent Clarifies How Graham Platner Is Not ‘DSA-Backed’
After Latest Platner Scandal, Bill Kristol Notes the GOP Nominated Ken Paxton
Hot Take: If Platner Was Blackout Drunk, How Do We Know She Didn’t...
Sunny Hostin’s 'Vote Blue No Matter Who' Brain Rot: Ride or Die for...
NYT Columnist Charles Blow Defends Platner Staying in the Race, Citing Donald Trump,...
Jill Filipovic Praises Dems for Discovering Sex Pests Are Bad — Just as...
‘I Believe Jenny’: MN Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan Now Believes a Woman
Dulling Her Sparkle: Congressman to File Articles of Impeachment Against Biden Activist Ju...

Jason Rantz: Seattle City Council moving to make women seeking abortions a protected class

Radio host Jason Rantz lives in Seattle so the rest of us don’t have to, and he sends up warning flares now and then whenever the city is preparing to do something particularly stupid. Now that Roe v. Wade has been overturned, Seattle City Council foresees a lot of pregnant women coming to the city seeking abortions, and it’s introduced legislation to make those women a protected class.

Advertisement

Rantz writes:

“The idea is to create, as a protected class, people who are seeking abortions, especially because we anticipate that there will be a lot of people coming to Washington seeking care,” said [council member Tammy] Morales.

The legislation adds protections for “an individual’s actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes.” Morales’ reasoning is both ridiculous and wholly contrived.

“We want to make sure that they aren’t targeted by restaurants or hotels or any other sort of entity that they are visiting while they’re here seeking that care,” she said.

We like the way she refers to abortion as “care.”

The proposed ordinance proclaims that:

“The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes” …

… restricting and/or denying access to abortion services will have a disproportionate impact on poor communities and Black, Indigenous, or people of color (BIPOC) communities …

… the City recognizes that transgender and gender diverse people with the capacity to become pregnant face increased barriers and stigma when accessing abortion services ….

Advertisement

Paging George Orwell … “perceived or alleged pregnancy outcomes”? “People with the capacity to become pregnant”?

Advertisement

The legislation is just virtue signaling within virtue signaling.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos