We’ve already reported once on UC Berkeley law professor Khiara Bridge calling Sen. Josh Hawley “transphobic” for suggesting that only women can get pregnant. We wouldn’t say she’s a hostile witness or anything, but here she is again, not answering Sen. John Cornyn’s question if unborn babies have value. Instead, Bridge pivots to her belief in the value of women and their agency, and when Cornyn points out that she’s not answering his question, she says she’s answering a question that’s “more interesting” to her.
Does an unborn baby have value? Just say no. If you’re there to argue for abortion on demand, without apology, into the third trimester, just say “no” and move on.
Sen. John Cornyn to law professor Khiara Bridge: "Do you think that a baby that is not yet born has value?" pic.twitter.com/CvePK9JHvO
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) July 12, 2022
She’s going to get her own MSNBC show after this hearing lmao
— High_Diddly_Doe (@awesomely_mike) July 12, 2022
Her inability and refusal to answer this question speaks volumes.
I'm not even religious and this is disgusting.
— Kahlia Jarral (@KahliaJarral) July 12, 2022
At a certain point, one realizes that the debate over abortion is very close to the debate over euthanasia.
— Jordi Got (@jord1got) July 12, 2022
Or eugenics
— Chesterton (@DarthGuitarHero) July 12, 2022
Wonder how she’d deal with a student who said, “I’m answering a more interesting question,” in her classroom.
— Think, Don’t Parrot (@RenaeG12) July 12, 2022
It’s remarkable that she heads a classroom with law students in it.
"I'm answering a more interesting question to me" says it all.
— Pale Nimbus (@Pale_Nimbus) July 12, 2022
“I’m answering a more interesting question, to me”
And she’s a law professor? We are so screwed.
— Entitled Karen (@Amanda23566546) July 12, 2022
Everything needs to be through my lived experience, through my perspective which can't be invalidated.
— ModerateAmerican (@Mericanmoderate) July 12, 2022
Answering “No” but with more words.
— Valley Voter (@Vote4Fedro) July 12, 2022
Impertinent.
— Bauble (@BaubleLikesPie) July 12, 2022
She is all about herself, and the agenda she wants to follow. She also could care less about the formality of government. That’s blatantly obvious. Oh, by the way. She’s about herself & her only
— Bill Dubs (@billdubs) July 12, 2022
They never answer simple questions goodness gracious
Stop letting these people set the rules for society
— Kangmin Lee ✞ (@kangminjlee) July 12, 2022
Our newest Supreme Court justice can’t define what a woman is.
She can’t answer the question because it destroys her narrative.
— estagro (@estagro) July 12, 2022
We told you about the “cheat sheet” Democrats sent around with the new terms to use when talking about abortion. For one, there are no “unwanted pregnancies,” only “unexpected pregnancies.” But the professor makes it pretty clear a baby has no value if it’s not wanted.
Related:
INSANITY: Sen. Hawley DRAGS pro-abort witness who called him ‘transphobic’ for suggesting only women can get pregnant (watch)https://t.co/aojPNxNJK4
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) July 12, 2022
Join the conversation as a VIP Member