OUCH! Elon Musk's Response to Knucklehead Tim Walz Cheering for a Tesla Stock...
Anarchy Down Under: Australian Journalist Gleefully Endorses Violence Against Elon Musk
I'm Your Huckleberry: Tyrus Accepts Challenge to Wrestle Tim Walz WWE Style
Elon Musk Recalls Biden White House Refusing His Help to Bring Astronauts Home...
EDS Sufferer Tim Walz Roots for Tesla Stock to Crash and Its 70,000...
Scott Jennings Clashes with Democrat CNN Panel Guests as They Excuse and Laugh...
Fiction Addiction: Hakeem Jeffries and the Dems Crank Up the Lies as Egg...
Attorney General Pam Bondi Responds to Fiery Terrorist Attack on Las Vegas Tesla...
Scott Bessent Answers Recession Query by Telling ‘Journo’ He Can’t Guarantee She’ll Have...
Gender Studies Prof Says ‘White Empiricism’ Undermines Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
Is Ubisoft Trying to Silence Bad Reviews of ‘Assassin's Creed: Shadows?’ (A Deep...
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Claims Biden Never Screamed About Judges - X User Posts...
The New Yorker Asks If the Left Can Win Back Young Men
Walz and Newsom: Why Is Our Pro-Illegal Alien Dem Party Losing with Pro-Border...
City Council Members Cry Over Votes to Cooperate With ICE

California diversity law requiring corporate boards to have minority and LGBT members ruled unconstitutional

It was way back in 2018 when Twitchy did a post on the California legislature passing a bill that would require that the boards of publicly traded companies include a “woman”; remember, this was back in 2018 when you didn’t need a biologist to determine what a woman was.

Advertisement

We’d kind of lost track of that story, but apparently, California went even further and passed a diversity law requiring that corporate boards include at least one minority member and one LGBT member. We’re learning from the AP’s Zeke Miller that the law has been declared unconstitutional, as any sane person could have told you.

CBS Los Angeles reports:

A Los Angeles judge ruled Friday that California’s landmark law mandating that corporations diversify their boards with members from certain racial, ethnic or LGBT groups is unconstitutional.

The brief ruling granted summary judgment to Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group that sought a permanent injunction against the measure that was signed into law last year. The ruling didn’t explain the judge’s reasoning.

The measure requires corporate boards of publicly traded companies with a main executive office in California to have a member from an “underrepresented community,” including LGBT, Black, Latino, Asian, Native American or Pacific Islander.

Advertisement

Hooray Judicial Watch!

Advertisement

As if woke California corporations aren’t already trying to diversify their boards. We just wonder how California was going to police this law — where’s your LGBT board member?


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos