DSA and Proud: MS NOW’s Symone Sanders Tries to Help Angie Nixon Downplay...
Here Are the Real Bad Guys Behind the Suicide of DEI Fabulist Jason...
Bill Kristol Triggered That Natalie Harp Makes More Than a Sailor on the...
Sports Columnist Resigns After Paper Spikes Piece Featuring Girls Opposed to Boys in...
Never Alone in the Motherhood Trenches: Why Extended Family Is Still the Best...
Angie Nixon Thinks ‘Make America Great Again’ Means Bombing Black People
Professor Who Exposed Jason Arday As a Plagiarist Suspended by Rector Whose Speech...
Pandering 101: Stepstool Scholar El-Sayed Claims He Knows Black Life Because He ‘Reads...
Mother of Navy Sailor Tells NYT ‘They Didn’t Sign Up to Be on...
Personal Space!: Scott Jennings Faces Screaming Matches and Double Standards on Abby Phill...
Dem State Sen. Crosses Party Lines to Oppose El-Sayed, Mehdi Hasan Demands She...
Islamic Convert Who Plotted to Bomb NY Capitol Building’s Original Target Was the...
Prosecutor Reveals Karmelo Anthony Fantasized About Stabbing Someone and Licking Blood Off...
Time to Clutch the Pearls: Jake Tapper Is BIG MAD at Pete Hegseth...
Golden State Fleece: Newsom Bravely Bears the ‘Grief’ for Taxpayer-Funded Illegal Alien He...

USA Today: Science says there's no simple answer to the definition of 'woman'

Wow, it’s not that we didn’t expect it, but the mainstream media is going above and beyond to do some repair work on some of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s stumbles during her confirmation hearing. Jackson’s claim that she couldn’t define what a woman is because she’s “not a biologist” was just embarrassing, but it’s touched off two days of hot takes on why that question wasn’t fair and it’s not so simple to answer.

Advertisement

It took USA Today a couple of days to put together, but they finally published a piece Thursday explaining that “science” says there’s no simple answer to the question, “What is a woman?” We’ve already seen once-reputable science journals trash their credibility over the reality of biological sex, so what does USA Today have to offer?

Alia E. Dastagir looked to “gender scholars,” trans activists, and more to put together a really, really lengthy piece to tackle this seemingly impossible to answer question. She writes:

Scientists, gender law scholars and philosophers of biology said Jackson’s response was commendable, though perhaps misleading. It’s useful, they say, that Jackson suggested science could help answer Blackburn’s question, but they note that a competent biologist would not be able to offer a definitive answer either. Scientists agree there is no sufficient way to clearly define what makes someone a woman, and with billions of women on the planet, there is much variation.

Advertisement

So the headline said according to science there was no simple answer, and yet Dastagir is interviewing “philosophers of biology” and “gender law scholars.”

Just as an aside, this editor is a man, but if he were a woman, he’d be pretty pissed right now.

Advertisement

This article has to be a couple of thousand words and it still doesn’t give us a definition, only this woke crap from a gender studies scholar:

“When Blackburn and the rest of her caucus support women’s full reproductive justice, when they aggressively try to solve the inequality of investment in girls’ and women’s sports – still true 50 years after Title IX made it illegal – when they take meaningful action on the persistent wage discrimination against women, especially women of color, then maybe it will make sense to engage their questions about who can count as a woman.”

Advertisement

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement