'Nobody Knows': Nate Bargatze Does The Meme!
CNN’s Dana Bash Wants Trump to Condemn Patriot Front March, Network Ignored Texas...
World Cup Red Card Drama Ends: Balogun Cleared to Play After FIFA Review...
The Secret Service Turns 161
Democrats Really SHOULD Be Embarrassed By This
Gov. Ron DeSantis Shares President Grant's Centennial Proclamation
Mournful Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy Blasts Illegal Truck Drivers
'Little Commie BAST**D' Zohran Mamdani Tries Backpedaling on His 'America Sucks' July 4...
PoliMath DISMANTLES Lefty Prof and His Thread Calling Patriot Front 'Republican Staffers'...
The Battle for America's Future Takes Center Stage
CHEERIO! Brits Are BIG MAD That Even Though They're OLDER, America Is Still...
George Washington Has PERFECT Reaction to Bite-in-the-Arse Lefty Lecturing About DANGEROUS...
'Hello Mr. Clinton': DataRepublican BRINGS THE PAIN After Bill Clinton Craps All Over...
Oh, Honey ... NO: Jessica Tarlov's Sideways 'Happy Independence Day' Post BOMBS in...
Dem Activist Pushing Obvious Patriot Front Photo-Op on Metro Blows Up in His...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement