Putting the ‘Art’ in Arthritis: Seniors Gather to Make Protest Signs for Saturday’s...
Jettisoned ‘Journos’: Jim Acosta Reacts to FCC Chair Brendan Carr Celebrating Cast-Off Med...
'Fight the Oligarchy' Bernie Sanders Caught in First Class While Government Workers Left...
'No Kings' Cheerleader Hakeem Jeffries Says OF COURSE Trump Always Had the Authority...
Nerdeen Kiswani Targeted in Foiled Firebomb Plot — The Same Tactics She Defended...
Trauma Drama: Tim Walz Whines About Anguish Minnesotans Are Feeling Due to Enforced...
New Secret Service Low: Agent on Jill Biden Detail Negligently Discharges Weapon …...
Party Priorities: Dem Pramila Jayapal Says ICE Must Be Prosecuted and Illegal Aliens...
Same People Who Defended Harassing Christian Bakers Now Cheer When Sarah Huckabee Sanders...
From Match Day Chaos to Monopoly Power: House Judiciary Exposes How the Residency...
The Hidden Cost of the Senate Deal: Unpaid ICE Support Staff Holding Up...
Public Health Officials Lied, Hypocrisy Ruled, Trust Died: Brutal X Thread Conor Friedersd...
Nice Backpedal, Bro! Jimmy Kimmel's Attempt at Damage Control on Markwayne Mullin Flops...
Democrats Unleash Celebrities to Fight Voter ID: 'Women Are Too Dumb to Get...
The Olympics FINALLY Adopts a Policy of Sanity, and CNN Just Can't Deal...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement