UK Police Spray Man Carrying Newly Purchased Baseball Bat in Its Original Packaging
Haitian Man Collapses in Tears While Being Fitted With Ankle Monitor by ICE
Hasan Piker, Rolling Stone's Latest Swoon-Worthy Terrorist Sympathizer
CNN Calls Out Tim Scott for Using Abdul El-Sayed's Full Name in Ads...
People Express Their Love for Harmless Minneapolis Highway Scooter Takeover
Mod Fraud: Jessica Tarlov Tries to Rebrand NYC DSA Member AOC As a...
New York DSA to Illegal Aliens: ‘You Don’t Have to Have Papers to...
Dems (Led by Bakari Sellers) Remain Obsessed With Nikki Haley’s Name and She’s...
Joe Scarborough Shocked Anti-Semitic DSA Co-Chair Wanted to Attend Hamas Rally After Oct...
WNBA Player’s 'White Privilege' Tweet After Flagrant Foul Suddenly Has Nothing to Do...
Lawsuit Seeks to Prevent Rumored Somali Gang Shootout at Minnesota State Fair
'Sacred Right to Seize Homes - or It's Over': Mamdani Aide Drops Mask,...
Francesca Hong Explains That Toxic White Supremacy Is Ingrained in This Country's History
Surgical Strife: Seattle City Council Approves Taxpayer Money for ‘Trans Refugee’ Sex Chan...
Sports Illustrated Changes Its Headline About Sophie Cunningham and ‘Karma’ After Backlash

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement