Honeymoon Over: Democrats Turn on Their Own After Fetterman Podcast Appearance With Katie...
Daily Beast Hits Rock Bottom: Smears Sec. Duffy's Newborn Grandchild in Deranged TDS...
Talarico's Mystery Vegan Gal Pal: Ex-Chief of Staff, Gay Bar Dancer, and the...
Christians: Stop Equating Paxton's Personal Sins with Talarico's Outright Heresy
Jill Biden’s Family Image Rehab Tour Crumbles: Even Dems and Ex-Aides Aren’t Buying...
Cough Once and Suddenly You Hate Open-Air Drug Markets: Pratt's Epic New Video...
Platner’s Phony War Grievance: Volunteered for Combat, Ignored His Parents, Then Blamed Su...
What Happened to the Man Who Built CNN Should Terrify Every American Over...
Maria Shriver Fears for Future of 'Free Press' (Translation: The Dem Propaganda Machine...
Symone Sanders Slams DNC's F-Bomb Social Media Meltdown — And the Defenders Pile...
Anti-ICE Rioters Arrested As Loser Dems Roasted Outside Detention Center
Clay Travis Uses Ken Paxton Ad and a Sideways Jasmine Crockett 'Compliment' to...
Obama's 'Pod Save Bros' Laugh As Jill Biden Admits She Thought Joe Was...
BRO, Do You Even History?! Ro Khanna SCHOOLED After Comparing Nazi Tat Democrat...
'You're BOTH Commies'! Kennedy SAVAGES Karen Bass for Bragging About Hanoi Jane's Endorsem...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos