SERIOUSLY? James Woods' Shot and Chaser Maddeningly Sums Up MSM-Style 'Priorities'
‘Justice’ for Just Us: Kamala Harris Tells Don Lemon She’ll Go After Trump’s...
Can’t Take a Joke: Doc Tells Joy Reid ‘Michelle Obama Is a Man’...
Butthurt in Texas: Crockett Bails on Dem State Convention, Still Furious Over Talarico...
SPLC-Funded Ossoff Suddenly Has Nothing to Say About His Donors' 'Pay-to-Play White Suprem...
Anne Hathaway Pregnant at 43: A Beautiful Blessing — And a Necessary Reality...
Shuck the Heck Up! 'Oysterman' Nazi College Dropout Lectures America on Impeaching SCOTUS...
Harry Truman, You Ain't: Victor Davis Hanson Sums Up Obama's Narcissistic Scolding In...
All Hell Broke Loose at Obama's Presidential Center Grand Opening
Seattle Leftists Vowed to Sit Out US Soccer Over Trump … Stadium Went...
The View Hags (Especially Ana Navarro) ATTACK Joy Behar for Treating JD Vance...
Knicks Fan Takes 'Steal City' Literally: Hauls Off Official Parade Trash Can
Chicagoan Calls Obamas Out Over Black Contractors and Workers Owed MILLIONS for Presidenti...
Cynical Publius Uses Simple MATH to Take Jake Tapper Blaming Hegseth for Flu...
Lefty Venture Capitalist Paul Graham BLOCKED Me for Pointing Out Dems Have ALWAYS...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos