Socialists and the City: Cynthia Nixon Scores a Sweet NY Gig After Staying...
Hijab-Wearing DSA Queen Linda Sarsour: 'Screw 1776, Let's Build a Document That Matches...
Maine Dem Freezes at Last Night's Debate, Blames ICE Shooting, Then Begs for...
Put American Students First: The Viral Indian Harvard Plea That Exposed Everything
Raccoon Swoon: Seattle Residents Hope to Catch a Glimpse of Cute Masked Bandit...
Carry On, Patriots! Navy Secretary Hung Cao Puts an END to Lefties Screeching...
Trump Exposes China, Democrats for 2020 Election Inteference
Jennifer Newsom Stumbles and Stammers When Confronted With the Fact the DOJ Probe...
Hillary Clinton Just Broke Her Projection Record While Ranting About Trump 'Undermining Ou...
Tim Walz's 'Friendly Reminder' About Donald Trump Is Blowing Up in His Face...
Dem Michigan Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Exposes His Own Wife as a Bigot...
CNN National Security Hack Gets Called Out for Bogus Claim About Election Interference...
Hot Take of the Week: Bring Back EV and Solar Tax Credits to...
Mamdani's Commie Care: Nothing Says 'Great Parenting' Like Dumping Your Kids With Randos...
ABC News' Did an On-Air Fact-Check After the Trump Speech They Refused to...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos