'We Were Sold a Character Arc': MSNOW Pundit Molly Jong-Fast Admits Media Bought...
John Fetterman Gives the WaPo a MUCH More Accurate Headline About Graham Platner's...
Amanda Litman Praises Michelle Goldberg’s Platner Apologia: ‘Everyone Made Mistakes Here’
Pundit Notes That GOP Isn’t Calling for Ken Paxton to Drop Out Despite...
Why This American Mom Chose Norway and Erling Haaland as Her New World...
Nick Searcy Spotted the Only Unforgivable Sin Cory Booker Isn't Willing to Overlook...
Ryan Grim, Drop Site News Report That Graham Platner's Victim Was Sort of...
Move Over for Do-Over?: Dem on CSPAN Says Platner Is ‘Obstructing’ a Fair...
Sarcastic 'Sorry, Not Sorry': MN Mayor Mocks Backlash After Ditching America's Birthday fo...
Chris Rufo's Latest Report on Gavin Newsom's California May Be the Most Stomach-Turning...
Trump Jr. Caught Something Insane at the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial
First Lady of NYC Hosting $5K Luxury Islamic Retreat Claiming Mary Was a...
Former Judge Hannah Dugan Given No Jail Time After Conviction for Obstructing ICE
Platner’s Team Goes Nuclear: Dems Planning Switch Behind Closed Doors While Our Guy...
WTF Are You Even SAYING? Keith Ellison Claims He Uses 'Gender-Affirming Care' Every...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement