CNN: Trump Has Activated a Never-Used 'Secretive Court' for Deporting ‘Alien Terrorists’
Jasmine Crockett Welcomes Witnesses to the Republican Party's 'Great Replacement Therapy S...
The AWFLs and Boomers Are Singing Again, This Time Performing 'Hit the Road,...
No, NDAA Section 219 Doesn’t Merge the U.S. and Israeli Militaries — Here’s...
Jamaican National Working as Southwest Flight Attendant Arrested by ICE After Years-Long O...
Mamdani Tells Jon Stewart They’d Be Slandered for Introducing Buildings That Lend Books...
Pint-Sized RI Rep. Enrique Sanchez Vows Biblical Payback on ICE for Deporting His...
Bombshell Biden Memo: Not So Temporary TPS to Shield Illegals & Trap Trump...
Black Lives Matter Protests Break Out in WI Where Man Who Stabbed Cop...
Epic Meltdowns: Hollywood Screams As Elon Musk Vows to Make Accurate AI Version...
Dem. Chuck Schumer Worried Trump’s Focus on Exposing Voter Fraud Will Help Him...
Ally of Senate Candidate Caught on Camera Bragging About Doxxing ICE Agent
Pointing the Way: Sophie Cunningham Inspires More Young Girls to Stand Up for...
BOOMITY: Marco Rubio Straight-FIRE Response About Trump's Foreign Policy Is FILLED With FA...
REE! Ben Rhodes Shrieks About INTERNATIONAL LAW in His Latest and Dumbest Rant...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement