So Much for That Whole 'Republican Strategist Lie': Never Trumper Sarah Longwell FINALLY...
Ted Lieu Mocking Trump for Speaking at Ohio HS Gym Inspires X to...
Ntl School Board Assn., DOJ, and Biden WH Officials Worked Hand-In-Hand to Target...
AWKWARD: VA Democrat Elaine Luria FREEZES When Asked Why She LOST to Jen...
NEWLY Declassified Docs Show Jack Smith Was Up to Absolutely NO GOOD Spying...
Scott Jennings Made Jake Tapper Look Stupid and It Was GLORIOUS (That's It,...
SLAAAY QUEEN: Roseanne Points Out There's NOTHING Democratic About Dems and Bill Maher...
Have You MET Your Son? Tim Kaine Shaming Trump for Not Being a...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Vulnerable Votes: Hulk Actor Mark Ruffalo Says Elon Musk Could Rig the Midterm...
NYTimes’ ‘Journo’ Michelle Cottle and ‘Republican’ Chris Christie Try Pinning Cornell Case...
The Lie That Snagged Me: Wealthy ‘Austin Powers’ Actor Mike Myers Loves Socialism...
'Argo F**k Yourself:' Iranian Director Criticizes Classic Movie for the Dumbest Reason Pos...
Message on Jack Smith's Shirt at 'Power to the People' Concert Confirms Partisan...
Pucker Up: Amy Klobuchar Disrespects the American Flag While Kissing Up to Somalis...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

…

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement