Third Chief of Staff Out: Fetterman’s Shift to Sanity Triggers DC Staff Revolt
Bruce Springsteen Says Stephen Colbert Lost His Show Because the President Can’t Take...
Jimmy Kimmel Urges Viewers Never to Turn On CBS Ever Again (After Colbert...
Gen Z vs. Gen X War Over Lunches Continues: PB&J Is 'What They...
'Because You Never Know When the Last One Is': Kyle Busch Passes Away...
Mastermind Behind $250 Million Feeding Our Future Scam Sentenced; Rep. Ilhan Omar Speechle...
Maine Senate Dem Candidate Graham Platner: Time Magazine's Latest Nazi-Chic Cover Boy
Hostin, We Have a Problem: Sunny Lies on The View, Claims BLM Riots...
Let Us All Join Brian Stelter In Mourning Over One Less Hour of...
Minnesota Fraud Defendant 'On the Run' After Jumping From Fourth Story Balcony to...
Majority Leader John Thune Announces Senate Will Go Home Until June
Sean Davis, Julie Kelly and Others Nuke Reuters' Post on 'Alleged Mishandling' of...
Douche-y VA Democrat Dan Helmer Openly Threatens SCOVA Justice Over Gerrymandering Ruling
Try Not to Get Whiplash From MS NOW's Ken Dilanian Doing a Fast...
May the Odds Be Ever in Your Favor: Zohran Mamdani's Socialist Hunger Games...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement