Mehdi Hasan Calls John Cleese a 'Racist Unhinged Ignoramus,' Cleese Calls Him a...
Cenk Uygur’s Muslim Pity Party: When ‘Oppressed’ Muslims Run Half the World
Hakeem Jeffries Disavows Antisemitic Dem Candidate in Texas, But What About Graham Platner...
From Elon’s Baby Mama to Hasan Piker's New Bestie: Ashley St. Clair’s Wildly...
SpaceX Employees Asked Not to Chant Nationalist Dogwhistles on Livestream
Sheriff Says She’ll Arrest Fake Made-Up Wannabe Law Enforcement: ‘You Don’t Want This...
Brilliant LA Hack: Spray 'Vote Pratt' Over Graffiti and Potholes — Watch Karen...
Graham Platner Notes the Words ‘Gaza’ and Genocide’ Didn’t Appear in DNC’s Autopsy
Rep. Steve Cohen Introduces Six Articles of Impeachment Against Chief Justice John Roberts
Porta-Potty Perv: GOP Ad Torches Dem Senate Candidate Graham Platner With His Own...
Pander Backfires: Protester Pulls Knife on CA Gov Candidate Tom Steyer’s Staff in...
Judge Dismisses Human Trafficking Case Against Maryland Man Kilmar Abrego Garcia as Vindic...
Hamas Supporter Mahmoud Khalil Will Appeal His Deportation Case to the Supreme Court
Kimmel Family Bullying Spree: Jimmy’s Sister-in-Law Harasses Bakery for Selling Spencer Pr...
OUCH! Nick Shirley Drops Receipts on Media AND Tim Walz Showing How They...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement