Victim Signaling: MN State Senator John Hoffman Tries to Link the Word 'Illegals'...
Democrats' Latest Great White Beta Male Hope Just Set a Record for Burning...
Pressley’s Hypocrisy: Fights to Make 'Temp' Protected Status Permanent for Haitians Yet Tr...
Tom Steyer's Radical Campaign Promise: Abolish ICE, Jail ICE Agents, and Turn CA...
Australian Journo on Team Humanity Hopes the US and Israel Suffer a Crushing...
CBS News: Five-Year-Old ‘Arrested’ by ICE Shows Signs of Psychological Trauma
AOC: Members of Congress Think They Can Get Away With It Because the...
Erika Kirk Backed Out of UGA Event with JD Vance Due to Serious...
'All Black Guys Look Like Obama?' Biden's Awkward Gaffe Goes Viral
WaPo Columnist Shadi Hamid: 'No Recollection' of Eric Swalwell Ever Running for President
Gov. Spanberger Signs Law Which Will Award VA's Electoral College Votes to Popular...
'They Don’t Know What They’re Talking About’: Homan Schools Pope on Immigration’s Brutal...
CNN's Kaitlan Collins Wins WHCA's Award for Excellence in Presidential News Coverage
Rubio Tuesday
Seth Dillon Drops Truth Bomb: Muslims Don’t Love Jesus, They Lie About Him

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement