Here's a Dramatization of 'Ilhan Omar and Her Accountants Discovering the 'Rounding Error'
Bill Maher Should Ask Jimmy Kimmel to Come on So They Can Compare...
'The Manhattan Project': Mamdani Promotes Visionary Idea to Have New Yorkers Using Trash...
Dem Sen. Ed Markey Trips Over a Big Stumbling Block While Claiming 'I'm...
AARP’s John Hishta Warns Criminals Are Targeting Older Americans
'Quite a Difference'! Ilhan Omar Filed a Not-So-Tiny Adjustment to Her Net Worth,...
Democrats Playing Politics With National Security
Where Are They Now? NY Post Catches Up With Porn Star Stormy Daniels...
Ron DeSantis Ends Pennsylvania’s Recruitment Attempt: ‘Florida Has More Wawa Stores’
NYT Tries Sympathy for Illegal Who Sneaked Back In to Birth ‘Anchor Baby’...
Ilhan Omar’s Phony ‘War Survivor’ Act Exposed: She Wasn’t a Victim — Her...
Christine Amanpour Claims She’s the Same Military Rank as Pete Hegseth: 'My Dog...
LIES! Ayanna Pressley: Deporting Haitians Will Collapse U.S. Healthcare Because They’re 1...
The Drunk Republican (and Others) Troll the UK MERCILESSLY After They Found Out...
'Isn't Communism Awesome?' 'New Study' About Mamdani's City-Owned Grocery Stores Will Only...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement