Out-of-Sync Ink: Dem Graham Platner Responds to Ex-Girlfriend’s Nazi Totenkopf Tattoo Time...
Update: Boston's Trans Period Pride Event Is Back On: 'We Are Not Backing...
Roseanne Remembers How No One Stood Up for Her
USA Today Reports Several GOP-Run States Have Declared June Nuclear Family Month
'Stay the Course': Parents of Children With Down Syndrome React to Despicable Abortion...
'The Only Good Cracker Is a Dead Cracker': This Karmelo Anthony Supporter Seems...
Delaney Hall Further Trolls Chef José Andrés With Menu of ‘Chef’s Signature Meals’
Paradise Lost: California’s Stunning Scenery Can’t Hide Its Comically Broken Elections
Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Mark Warner Butthurt Over SCOTUS Upholding Alabama’s Congressional...
Rep. LaMonica McIver Notes That Every Detainee in Delaney Hall Is a Person...
Not Sending Their Best: Bessent Exposes Democrat Rep. Chu's Shocking Ignorance
NYT Bombshell: Platner's Exes Reveal Assaults, Dominance Rape Fantasies, 'Hatchet Wounds,'...
CNN’s Aaron Blake Scolds Ron DeSantis for Spreading Baseless Suspicion About CA Election
New York State Dems Pass Bill to Change ‘Mother’ to ‘Gestating Parent’
Thousands of Families Are Reading the Declaration of Independence to Their Kids

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement