ABC News Interviews Alex Pretti’s Grieving Family, Who Want Accountability
Variety Thinks Rosie O'Donnell Should Shatter Comedy's Glass Ceiling With Her Own Show
Active Duty USAF Major Who Called for Trump’s Impeachment on Capitol Steps Charged...
Mayor Agrees With Don Lemon That Gary, IN Is Being Neglected Because It's...
Transgender Inmates, Including Baby Killer, Suing State Over Lack of 'Gender-Affirming Car...
Boston’s Rockin’ Debut: Fifty Years of ‘More Than a Feeling’ (It’s Been Such...
ABC, NBC News Report on Power Outage in Gary, IN, Neglect to Mention...
LIVE Primary Results! Twitchy Has the Latest South Carolina, Georgia, and Oklahoma Primary...
'I Kind of Laughed': SLOTUS Usha Vance’s Gracious Reply to Stepstool Abdul El-Sayed’s...
After SCOTUS Ruling on Mail-In Voting, Gov. Gavin Newsom Says CA Will Sue...
Did Tim Walz Just Encourage President Trump to Invade Canada, or Is He...
Target Pulls ‘Blacklight Circus Clown’ Costume After Blackface Outrage
Tropical Storm Dolly? Next Atlantic System Could Share Name of Country Legend Days...
Judge Blocks Ohio Law Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Register to Vote
'Repeat the Line': Stepford Governor Gavin Newsom Has One Memorized Phrase He's Recited...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement