Since the New York Times outed the whistleblower as a CIA agent, it seems they’re just going ahead and calling him or her the CIA whistleblower. There’s been a lot of criticism from the start that the whistleblower wasn’t on the call in question and got his or her information secondhand, and now we have breaking news from the Times saying, according to the whistleblower, a White House official the next day called the phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky “crazy” and “frightening.”
So we don’t know who this person is either or his or her relationship to the whistleblower, but we do know the person was pretty triggered by the call — and we know that because someone leaked it. We’re supposed to know this, apparently to bolster the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.
Breaking News: President Trump’s Ukraine call was “crazy” and “frightening,” a White House official said the next day, according to the CIA whistle-blower.https://t.co/0OYoUBoQci
— The New York Times (@nytimes) October 8, 2019
So hang on — the whistleblower wrote a memo (sounds like James Comey) describing an unnamed official who heard the call and was “visibly shaken” by it the next day. Just what did the White House leave out of the transcript it released?
More TDS porn for the addicted.
— Jon A (@Latebird2013) October 8, 2019
The transcript was hardly frightening. WH official must be a millennial.
— Howard Beal (@HowardBealisMad) October 8, 2019
What the hell did he say?
— Chuck Savage (@ChuckSavageUSA) October 8, 2019
Guys, we literally have the transcript…
— Jamie (@mean_pillz) October 8, 2019
I wasn't triggered by the transcript when I read it.
— The Librarian (@UniveralLibrary) October 8, 2019
— Mike Grove (@GroveKilosdad73) October 8, 2019
This BS is seriously blowing up in Democrat’s faces. Sooner or later, even the NYTimes will have to report on the serious damage it is doing to the reputations of those who are pushing this nonsense.
— Mark Thompson (@mtbinary) October 8, 2019
It’ll all become clear when the whistleblower testifies off-site behind a screen with his or her voice and appearance altered so Republicans can’t leak a name.
BREAKING: Transcript was already released and is the opposite….
— Moegreen (@Bill29487414) October 8, 2019
According to a political opponent
— Bill The Butcher (@BillButcher666) October 8, 2019
Breaking news: NYT goes the Russian collusion way again, publishing stuff people pull out of their ass on a daily basis. ?
— Luka Valas (@lukavalas) October 8, 2019
The transcript is in the public, no need of the hype. We can think for ourselves..
— Cecelle (@cecelle7509) October 8, 2019
Lol, we already have the transcript.
We are treating secondhand opinions with more importance than the firsthand info the public already has access to…
— Uranium Covfefe (@zoochum) October 8, 2019
Everything is frightening to liberals.
— kean silgich (@rockkean) October 8, 2019
Everything is frightening to liberals. Go hide
— Gregg (@ECTSpoiler41) October 8, 2019
— Denny Loggins (@DennyLoggins) October 8, 2019
Another leak…. get the transcript
— matthewdiel (@matthewdiel1) October 8, 2019
It definitely seemed that way from the transcript ?
— Dustin Naumann (@DustinNaumann) October 8, 2019
I think the @nytimes is "crazy" and "frightening."
— Jason Key (@senorllave) October 8, 2019
It seems that all of these stories about the crazy content of the call were pre-written under the assumption that Trump wouldn’t hand over the transcript…
— PointlessToil (@pointlesstoil) October 8, 2019
Yep. And Speaker Nancy Pelosi finally decided to announce an impeachment inquiry one day before the transcript was released.
Let me guess…an unnamed source.
— Paul A. Hacker (@paulatcvs) October 8, 2019
I sure was scared when I read it
— Loralie (@mama02dogs) October 8, 2019
Breaking news: we’ve had the transcript for days and days now.
— Phillipa Coleman (@ColemanPhillipa) October 8, 2019
It's like these articles were pre written and was ready to roll out except Trump released the transcript and had the president of Ukraine verify Trumps version of the call throwing a wrench in this scheme, NYT gonna print them anyways lol
— Agent Kujan (@pinoyrudeboy) October 8, 2019
Breaking News: Transcript was released like forever ago
— John Parshon (@JohnParshon) October 8, 2019
Lol, the whistleblower has extra sneaky third hand knowledge of the event.
— JMichael (@Biff_Tanon) October 8, 2019
So crazy…. So frightening….. pic.twitter.com/LRQiX2Oc5w
— The Flapjack Bandit (@SavagePooh209) October 8, 2019
He already released the transcript . Transcript did not live up to hype.
Now @nytimes is trying to beat the dead horse. Sorry its done.
— NG (@Neilgrover5) October 8, 2019
Democrats considering distorting the whistleblower’s appearance and voice so Republicans can’t leak their identity https://t.co/X3ng9A6WET
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) October 8, 2019