Justice Alito Corners ACLU: 'What Is a Man or Woman?' — They Had...
Dashcam Video Shows Anti-ICE Agitator Being ‘Run Over’ by Police
OOPS! Joy Reid Says the Quiet Part Out Loud In Insanely Racist Rant...
Pete Hegseth's Response to Mark Kelly Whining About 'Finding Out' (After He Eff'd...
WHOA: Epstein Files MUST Be DAMNING for Bill and Hillary Clinton to Ditch...
CNN Pours Cold Water on Pathetic Anti-ICE Lawsuit
Chain-Wearing Skeeze I've Never Heard of Made the Dumbest Comparison Between ICE and...
Jessica Tarlov Jumps in the Renee Good DEBATE Because Gawd Knows She Can't...
People Magazine Allows Woke, Mouth-Breathing She/Her to Turn Scott Adams' Obit Into HATE-F...
Lollipop Guild Representative Robert Reich Gets Schooled on What a REAL Dictatorship Looks...
*SNORT* Zohran Mamdani Learns the Hard Way That ICE Doesn't GAF About Him...
Aww, Wassamatta, BUBBA? Bill Clinton Ghosts House Oversight Deposition (Does NOT Sound Goo...
'May He Rest in Eternal Glory and Peace': Scott Adams Has Passed Away...
New Footage Showing Aftermath of MN Shooting Tells Us SO MUCH About Why...
'Temporary Means TEMPORARY': Trump Admin Done PLAYING With Fraud-Happy Somalis (Yeah, It J...

Washington Post: House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism is Nancy Pelosi's 'most shameful decision'

Twitchy’s already covered Slate’s hot take on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic statements (she’s excused because she’s a little ignorant and probably doesn’t realize what she’s saying could be considered offensive), but it’s the Washington Post that has really stepped up Tuesday:

Advertisement

You’ll notice one of those three headlines falls under the opinion section and was written by Paul Waldman, who considers it “shameful” of Speaker Nancy Pelosi to bring to the floor a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism (and not even mentioning Omar by name).

Sure, her current term as Speaker of the House is only a couple of months old, but her “most shameful decision”?

It’s like she’s acknowledging there’s anti-Semitism in her own party (rather than just ignoring it). Waldman writes:

Now, back to Omar. Here’s the truth: The whole purpose of the Democrats’ resolution is to enforce dual loyalty not among Jews, but among members of Congress, to make sure that criticism of Israel is punished in the most visible way possible. This, of course, includes Omar. As it happens, this punishment of criticism of Israel is exactly what the freshman congresswoman was complaining about, and has on multiple occasions. The fact that no one seems to acknowledge that this is her complaint shows how spectacularly disingenuous Omar’s critics are being.

You may have noticed that almost no one uses “dual loyalty” as a way of questioning whether Jews are loyal to the United States anymore. Why has it almost disappeared as an anti-Semitic slur? Because, over the last three decades, support for Israel has become increasingly associated with conservative evangelicals and the Republican Party.

Advertisement

If support for Israel has become increasingly associated with the Republican Party (which it has, and good for them), why are House Democrats introducing this resolution? To bolster Republican support of Israel? Or because they’re seeing what Waldman refuses to see?

There wouldn’t even be a resolution if Omar hadn’t created the need for it.

Advertisement

So a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism in general is a bad thing?


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement