WSJ Reports: Trump Considering Dropping Hegseth as Secretary of Defense for Florida Govern...
CNN Claims Kash Patel is the Target of an Iranian Hack and No...
POLITICO: Biden Chose His Family Over His Political Legacy
Andy McCarthy's Idea That Trump Should Submit His Nominees to FBI Background Checks...
Adams Smasher! Democrat New York Mayor Splits with Party to Work with Trump...
Axios: Some Democrats Fear Biden Has Cost the Party Its Moral High Ground
Setting Off Alarms! Dem Jamaal Bowman Wants Biden to Pardon Death Row Murderers...
Gavin Newsom Ensures Biden Pardon Doesn’t Derail Possible Future Presidential Run
CNN's Brian Stelter Upset Fox News Viewers Don't Know About Pete Hegseth Scandals
Past, Present, and Future: Notre Dame's Reopening Is a Cause for Celebration
COVID Casualty: Trump’s DEA Pick Chad Chronister Resigns Amidst MAGA Backlash
Heebie-CGs: Snow White Movie Dwarfs Reveal is the Stuff of Nightmares
But Crime Is Down, Right? Secret Service Open Fire on Carjackers Outside Janet...
WOKE Wipeout: Donald Trump, Jr. Says That DEI is DOA on Day One
Tearing Down the Walz: Joe Rogan Describes Why Kamala’s VP Choice Forced Him...

Washington Post: House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism is Nancy Pelosi's 'most shameful decision'

Twitchy’s already covered Slate’s hot take on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic statements (she’s excused because she’s a little ignorant and probably doesn’t realize what she’s saying could be considered offensive), but it’s the Washington Post that has really stepped up Tuesday:

Advertisement

You’ll notice one of those three headlines falls under the opinion section and was written by Paul Waldman, who considers it “shameful” of Speaker Nancy Pelosi to bring to the floor a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism (and not even mentioning Omar by name).

Sure, her current term as Speaker of the House is only a couple of months old, but her “most shameful decision”?

It’s like she’s acknowledging there’s anti-Semitism in her own party (rather than just ignoring it). Waldman writes:

Now, back to Omar. Here’s the truth: The whole purpose of the Democrats’ resolution is to enforce dual loyalty not among Jews, but among members of Congress, to make sure that criticism of Israel is punished in the most visible way possible. This, of course, includes Omar. As it happens, this punishment of criticism of Israel is exactly what the freshman congresswoman was complaining about, and has on multiple occasions. The fact that no one seems to acknowledge that this is her complaint shows how spectacularly disingenuous Omar’s critics are being.

You may have noticed that almost no one uses “dual loyalty” as a way of questioning whether Jews are loyal to the United States anymore. Why has it almost disappeared as an anti-Semitic slur? Because, over the last three decades, support for Israel has become increasingly associated with conservative evangelicals and the Republican Party.

Advertisement

If support for Israel has become increasingly associated with the Republican Party (which it has, and good for them), why are House Democrats introducing this resolution? To bolster Republican support of Israel? Or because they’re seeing what Waldman refuses to see?

There wouldn’t even be a resolution if Omar hadn’t created the need for it.

Advertisement

So a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism in general is a bad thing?


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement