Legacy Media Outlets Downplay Moroccans Swarming Into Spain, Focus on ‘Right-Wing’ Respons...
White Site: Kamala Harris’s DEI Devotion Ends at Border of Her Swanky New...
Sen. Corey Booker Observes Brian Sicknick Day in New Jersey, Who Gave His...
LBC: Three Migrants Found Dead on Boat in the English Channel; All Women,...
'Now Is the Time to Do What You're Told': MAZE Compiles COVID Fear-Mongering...
Trump Invites Viral Teen Lifeguard Hero to the White House — and Usual...
Madison Is Paying Overtime to Keep CRAZ, the Corey Ruiz Autonomous Zone, Blocked...
Bernie Sanders Asks How ‘Poor’ Mark Zuckerberg Will Survive If CA Passes Wealth...
Maine Dems Swap Nazi Senate Candidate for Guy Who Fathered Kids With His...
Haitian Migrant Reminds Us That Haitians Built America
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Posts Cringe-Inducing Anti-ICE Dad Joke
Clay Travis Reminds America: While Fauci Deflects, DeSantis Faced the Tyranny—and Saved Us
Idol Foments: MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell Defiantly Refuses to Accept Fauci’s a Fraud,...
Spanish Prime Minister Is Fully Committed to 'Restoring Normalcy' During Invasion of Moroc...
Faux Photo: WGN Airs Fake Pic of 49ers Coach in Hospital Bed Flanked...

Washington Post: House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism is Nancy Pelosi's 'most shameful decision'

Twitchy’s already covered Slate’s hot take on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic statements (she’s excused because she’s a little ignorant and probably doesn’t realize what she’s saying could be considered offensive), but it’s the Washington Post that has really stepped up Tuesday:

Advertisement

You’ll notice one of those three headlines falls under the opinion section and was written by Paul Waldman, who considers it “shameful” of Speaker Nancy Pelosi to bring to the floor a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism (and not even mentioning Omar by name).

Sure, her current term as Speaker of the House is only a couple of months old, but her “most shameful decision”?

It’s like she’s acknowledging there’s anti-Semitism in her own party (rather than just ignoring it). Waldman writes:

Now, back to Omar. Here’s the truth: The whole purpose of the Democrats’ resolution is to enforce dual loyalty not among Jews, but among members of Congress, to make sure that criticism of Israel is punished in the most visible way possible. This, of course, includes Omar. As it happens, this punishment of criticism of Israel is exactly what the freshman congresswoman was complaining about, and has on multiple occasions. The fact that no one seems to acknowledge that this is her complaint shows how spectacularly disingenuous Omar’s critics are being.

You may have noticed that almost no one uses “dual loyalty” as a way of questioning whether Jews are loyal to the United States anymore. Why has it almost disappeared as an anti-Semitic slur? Because, over the last three decades, support for Israel has become increasingly associated with conservative evangelicals and the Republican Party.

Advertisement

If support for Israel has become increasingly associated with the Republican Party (which it has, and good for them), why are House Democrats introducing this resolution? To bolster Republican support of Israel? Or because they’re seeing what Waldman refuses to see?

There wouldn’t even be a resolution if Omar hadn’t created the need for it.

Advertisement

So a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism in general is a bad thing?


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement