Wow, Hillary Clinton really is the most qualified candidate for president ever. Even though she pinned the WikiLeaks document dumps on Vladimir Putin and his puppet Donald Trump during the third and final debate, she’s confident she can strike a deal with the Russians to save Syria from their aggression.
Good “no fly zone” question for #HillaryClinton. “I think we could strike a deal with #Russia” #Debate2016
— Bahman Kalbasi (@BahmanKalbasi) October 20, 2016
Q: @HillaryClinton "If a "no fly zone" over Syria & Russia violates it, would you shoot down plane?" A: "We could strike a deal" #debate
— Ben Swann (@BenSwann_) October 20, 2016
That’s great news coming on the heels of the current administration’s hot streak with striking deals, ranging all the way from Bowe Bergdahl to the Iran nuclear deal to that totally coincidental passing in the night of hostages and a pallet of cash.
How is Hillary going to strike a deal with the Russians when she keeps blaming them for her mistakes?
— Aaron Gilman (@Gillybertarian) October 20, 2016
https://twitter.com/xtriadx/status/788928732740280321
She’s going to present them with the biggest, the classiest reset button, made by union workers in America with American steel.
Hillary says we could strike a deal with Russia and Syria..how's that been working for you, Obama and Kerry so far. You're incompetent
— Traveling Homebody (@lamourpourlavie) October 20, 2016
https://twitter.com/Lacodia/status/788929184450109440
Recommended
She’d already pivoted to Russia once in search of a debate bailout, but those pesky document dumps, courtesy of Russia, just keep coming back to land on her forehead. She’s for a no-fly zone now?
"I think a no-fly zone could save lives and hasten the end of the conflict." – Hillary Clinton #DebateNight pic.twitter.com/iVYdZrnNC2
— CBS News (@CBSNews) October 20, 2016
Hillary doubles down on no-fly zone saying it would save lives while privately telling bank CEOs it will kill "lots of Syrians" #debatenight https://t.co/ZO97wRp35g
— Abby Martin (@AbbyMartin) October 20, 2016
https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/788929094486466564
Hillary to Goldman Sachs 6/4/2013: No-fly zone in Syria would require killing lots of civilians. pic.twitter.com/EKT1GR2mNW
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) October 15, 2016
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/788926417350365184
She’s just that qualified.
Nobody seems to care about Hillary's plan to create a no-fly zone over Syria, which would require killing thousands of innocent civilians.
— Jack Kleese (@jack_kleese) October 20, 2016
Implementing a no-fly zone in Syria would require a MINIMUM of 10,000 troops on the ground.
Not to mention potential war with Russia.— Bryce Adkins (@BigAdkins) October 20, 2016
Last time HRC advocated a "no-fly zone," Gen. Keane emailed her to say the term "misrepresents what we are actually doing" — regime change pic.twitter.com/8eZsKFy1wV
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 19, 2016
Hillary Clinton's proposal of a no-fly zone is incredibly reckless & will ultimately lead to war with Russia. This is NOT acceptable #debate
— Ajamu Baraka (@ajamubaraka) October 20, 2016
https://twitter.com/scyrx/status/788934998988468224
HRC once again evades the question on complications that could result from a no-fly zone. She's dodged questions all night. #debate
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 20, 2016
Good good question about a No Fly Zone.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) October 20, 2016
hey an actual question on a no fly zone that addresses what it entails
— Adam H. Johnson (@adamjohnsonNYC) October 20, 2016
Good follow-up q from CW to Hillary on how her no-fly zone over Syria would work & whether she'd shoot down planes.
NO answer. #debate— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) October 20, 2016
It took three debates for a moderator to have the curiosity to ask about Clinton's No Fly Zone vis-a-vis a war with Russia. Wonder why.
— Ursus, Director of Weather and Banana Programming (@AceofSpadesHQ) October 20, 2016
https://twitter.com/TPCarney/status/788928461415059456
A lot of former Sanders supporters are really going to be feeling the burn over that particular non-answer.
Well done to Chris Wallace for probing the implications of HRC's cataclysmic position on the "No-Fly Zone," which both Obama & Trump oppose
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 20, 2016
Imposing a no fly zone in syria could trigger a conflict with russia, but critics say the alternative is watching the slaughter. #debate
— Richard Engel (@RichardEngel) October 20, 2016
And that’s different from what the administration is currently doing … how? Will Hillary’s red lines be that much brighter than Obama’s? Solar powered?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member