The media at large might be in love with Obama’s war, but political strategist and CNN and ABC contributor has deemed it “macho bluster,” not to mention costly.
Bluster, bluster, bluster. Macho bluster. War is costly – in human lives & treasury. How will the U.S. pay for it? Will the coalition help?
— Donna Brazile (@donnabrazile) September 23, 2014
@donnabrazile tired of wars. maybe war doesn't work.
— Ms. C. Tweets (@Maestratweets) September 23, 2014
@donnabrazile So many beer-drunk, armchair warmongers where I live, happy to send our kids there but wouldn't go themselves!
— ???? ?????? ????? (@RitaEvelynYanez) September 23, 2014
@donnabrazile good question for John McCain. He wants to make sure young people don't get old like him. American death is his glory.
— truth (@whodatnick) September 23, 2014
Speaking of macho…
@whodatnick @donnabrazile Obama's directing this, why the fixation on McCain?
— Paul W Drake (@PaulWDrake) September 23, 2014
@donnabrazile Funny how Donna can't bring herself to mention the name Obama as commander in chief running this
— Paul W Drake (@PaulWDrake) September 23, 2014
"Macho bluster" @donnabrazile ??? Didn't Hillary want to hit Syria when she was Sec of State?? https://t.co/xLMq8lsFjW
— Kathleen McKinley (@KatMcKinley) September 23, 2014
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.