Democrat Podcaster Jim Acosta Fears That Republican Scott Jennings Will Soon Have His...
Mark Cuban: Democrat Party Should Shell Out Millions to Hire Mamdani’s Socialist Social...
Deranged Clickbait Islamist Prays for Wrath of Allah, Gets Biblical Spanking Instead
Saturday Night Live Sketch Mocking Tourette's Gets a Community Note
WSJ: Trump Admin Using English Tests to Crack Down on CDLs for Asylum-Seekers
NYT’s Peter Baker Seems Upset Trump Didn't Rush Back to the Oval Office...
'Going to Be HILARIOUS'! Trump Announces a FIRST in His 2 Terms (Have...
Axios CEO: Debate If Death of Khamenei Was Worth 3 American Lives Will...
Loon Who Campaigned for Elizabeth Warren Says Every US Official Is a Legitimate...
Guy From Project Liberal Thinks He's Found the ‘Republican Benghazi’
Rashida Tlaib and Mehdi Hasan Keep Upping the Body Count of School Allegedly...
Marco Rubio Lays WASTE to Democrats Crying Because Trump 'Did Not Notify Congress'...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett: Don't Scapegoat Immigrants After Mass Shooting by Man from Senegal
HUME-ILIATED! Brit Hume Just Took Democrats and Their BIG IRAN GOTCHA Apart With...
Trump Just Obliterated The Iranian Regime (Operation Epic Fury)

NYT's Roger Cohen wrongly claims credit for coining insipid 'Romnesia' line

This is almost like fighting over who gets credit for inventing New Coke or the vuvuzela. Tonight the New York Times’ Richard Cohen tried to take credit for coining the term Romnesia, a term which the president has beaten so close to death on the campaign trail that the RNC is now using it in ads.

Advertisement

Cohen’s followers were quick to point out that no, Cohen doesn’t get royalties.

George Monbiot did write a column for the Guardian in September called “Romnesia,” which he described as “the ability of the very rich to forget the context in which they made their money.”

Advertisement

That challenger has backed off, but as Twitchy reported, Mother Jones’ David Corn published an article back in June called “A Case of Romnesia.” For what it’s worth, Wikipedia dates the term back to April 2011, but I think we can all agree: enough, already.

If the New York Times is looking for something new and fresh to write about, might we suggest the Benghazi cover-up?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement