First-Grade Teacher: May Day Protest Is Really Cool Way to Teach K-6 How...
Matt Van Swol Has Words for Organizers of ‘Kids Over Corporations’ Rally That...
Bill Maher Reminds 'No Kings' Democrats That They're a Total Joke
Let's Flash Back to a Time When EVERY Late Night Show Host (and...
Elizabeth Warren Assigns Blame for JetBlue/Spirit Merger Getting Blocked Under Biden While...
WATCH: Poodles and Bullet-Proof Vests? President Trump's Got Jokes
'Arsonist and Firefighter' Elizabeth Warren Just Got Community Note Nuked Over Her 'Compet...
Sean Duffy Lambastes Elizabeth Warren and Team Biden in a Brutal Reality Check...
Watch the Look on Gavin Newsom's Face As Bill Maher Torches His High...
Guess What the AP Did NOT Mention in Their Story About Spirit Airlines...
Elizabeth Warren's 2-Year-Old 'Biden Win for Flyers' Brag Has Aged Wonderfully (So Has...
Jim Acosta: Scott Jennings on CNN Represents a ‘MAGA State TV World That...
Maine Squeeze? MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough Appears to Have Finally Found His Mr....
Sick Take: 'Sure He's a Nazi, But Blue No Matter Who' Regarding Maine...
Socialist Seattle Mayor Gets Aggressively Saved By Handlers When a Reporter Politely Asks...

NYT's Roger Cohen wrongly claims credit for coining insipid 'Romnesia' line

This is almost like fighting over who gets credit for inventing New Coke or the vuvuzela. Tonight the New York Times’ Richard Cohen tried to take credit for coining the term Romnesia, a term which the president has beaten so close to death on the campaign trail that the RNC is now using it in ads.

Advertisement

Cohen’s followers were quick to point out that no, Cohen doesn’t get royalties.

George Monbiot did write a column for the Guardian in September called “Romnesia,” which he described as “the ability of the very rich to forget the context in which they made their money.”

Advertisement

That challenger has backed off, but as Twitchy reported, Mother Jones’ David Corn published an article back in June called “A Case of Romnesia.” For what it’s worth, Wikipedia dates the term back to April 2011, but I think we can all agree: enough, already.

If the New York Times is looking for something new and fresh to write about, might we suggest the Benghazi cover-up?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement