The Times: 'The Psychological Demands of Aaron Rupar’s Work Are Immense'
Boston Deploys Mental Health Clinician to Deal With Sword-Wielding Criminal Who Is Shot...
Iran Scored Major Victory in (Checks Notes) Lego AI War
AP: Trump Administration Terminates Agreements to 'Protect' Trans Students in Schools
Dem Rep. Dan Goldman's Attempt to Carry Anti-Billionaire Torch for 'Working Families' Is...
Court Throws Out (Former) Judge Hannah Dugan's Appeal of Her Felony Conviction
FL Chef (Fresh From CA) Demands Trump’s Murder – Perfect Example of Why...
Aaron Rupar Can’t Rule Out Trump’s Truth Social Post as a Threat to...
In Her Deepest Pain, Savannah Guthrie Questions God — Here’s Why We Should...
Neera Tanden: It's Pretty Disgusting a Trump Ally is Using the Baltimore Sun...
Euroweenie Mocks Spiking of Military Aircraft ‘To Rescue One Guy’
John Konrad BLISTERS Europe In a Devastating Post About the REAL Reason NATO...
Physician, Heal Thyself: WaPo/Guardian Hack Lectures World That Only Journalists Should Be...
CBS News: Five-Year-Old ‘Arrested’ by ICE ‘Still Living With the Trauma’
Army Sergeant's Illegal Wife Detained by ICE: Not 'Caged', Just Facing Long-Ignored Deport...

NYT's Roger Cohen wrongly claims credit for coining insipid 'Romnesia' line

This is almost like fighting over who gets credit for inventing New Coke or the vuvuzela. Tonight the New York Times’ Richard Cohen tried to take credit for coining the term Romnesia, a term which the president has beaten so close to death on the campaign trail that the RNC is now using it in ads.

Advertisement

Cohen’s followers were quick to point out that no, Cohen doesn’t get royalties.

George Monbiot did write a column for the Guardian in September called “Romnesia,” which he described as “the ability of the very rich to forget the context in which they made their money.”

Advertisement

That challenger has backed off, but as Twitchy reported, Mother Jones’ David Corn published an article back in June called “A Case of Romnesia.” For what it’s worth, Wikipedia dates the term back to April 2011, but I think we can all agree: enough, already.

If the New York Times is looking for something new and fresh to write about, might we suggest the Benghazi cover-up?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement