Radical Left Rising: Britt Blasts Abortion Extremism, Johnson Warns of Midterm Stakes
Pull Yourself Together, Hasan — Getting Giddy Over Trump Calling You a Terrorist...
Mark Cuban Gripes About High California Taxes Before Endorsing James Talarico in Texas...
NYT Reporter Warns DSA-Dems Want to ‘Take Out Our Entire Constitutional System’ on...
Jasmine Crockett Says the Democrat Party Will Face a Racial Reckoning After Midterm...
'Stop Gaslighting Me!': FL Dem. Senate Nom and Dem Chair Explode in Yelling...
Oh, SHELL No!: Canadian WNBA Team Introduces Non-Binary Turtle Mascot With She/They Pronou...
One Meta Data Center Just Doubled (and Then Some) Teachers’ Pay in a...
Chris Cuomo Says Ossoff’s Natalie Harp Dig Meant Her and Trump Hanging Out...
Melugin Highlights Illegal Who Poured Hot Wax on Kids — Then Schools Cato...
Men Dump Girlfriends Who Defend Lindsay Clancy: 'Not Who You Want Raising Your...
NYT’s 'Honest Mistake' Just Cost It $9.25M After Falsely Tying Innocent Alabama Hooper...
One Mom Tried to Ban Oreos From the Entire Class Lunchbox — and...
JD Vance Reveals Usha’s Sleep Training Approach: Start From the Beginning
Croon-Fed Insanity: Rosie O’Donnell Sings About Trump on Kimmel's Show As Acosta Applauds...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement