Escape Podcast: Ratings-Challenged CNN Appears to Have Ended Jake Tapper’s Office-Based Sh...
Freedom of the Prez: Democrat Activist ‘Journo’ Don Lemon Isn’t Ruling Out a...
Fang Pangs: Dem Eric Swalwell Decries His Transparency Standards Being Applied to Own...
BBC Asks if the UK Is Becoming Too Dog-Friendly
The Hill: GOP Calls to Get 'Undocumented Children' Out of Public Schools Grow
Newsweek: Trump Says Birthright Citizenship Wasn’t Meant for Rich People From China
Bill Melugin's 'Inflammatory Framing' of Michigan Synagogue Attack Causes Butthurt
Daily Beast: New Investigation Corroborates Claims of Woman Who Says Trump Sexually Abused...
Vox Asks If It’s Wrong to Send Your Child to a Private School
When 'Equity' Meets Reality: Trans Woman Rages as Biological Woman Cuts the Queue...
WaPo's Breaking News Indicates Eric Swalwell's Attorneys Do NOT Want Kash Patel to...
Did 'Coach' Walz Write It? X ROASTS Dems Over New 'Playbook For Winning...
‘Not Possible’ to Tell Which Twin Is the Father — Because the Mother...
Councilwoman Tells Public to Strip Off Their Clothes Made From the Cotton Picked...
Mayor Smiley: Mural for Slain Ukrainian Refugee Iryna Zarutska Must Go — It's...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement