Venezuela Vexed: Chuck Schumer Was Fired Up for Maduro's Removal Until Trump Made...
The EU's Official Statement on De-Maduroing Venezuela Is as Useless as You'd Expect
Leo Terrell: 'Democrats Are Lying to Americans'
Cory Booker Using the Constitution to Shame Congress Over Maduro Raid Is Just...
Venezuela Libre! Maduro's Arrest Has Venezuelans Around the World Dancing in the Streets
Jonathan Turley Comments on the Use of Military Forces Without a War Declaration
'ABSURD'! Marco Rubio OWNS Margaret Brennan in HEATED Back and Forth Over Trump's...
WATCH Chris Murphy's FACE When Dana Bash (Yes, That Dana Bash) Calls Him...
'The Irony. The SIZZLE': Hilarious Thread Highlights the BEST Satirical Posts Following Fa...
2026: Happy New Year to America's 250th Birthday
BREADCRUMBS: Asra Nomani Exposes Who Organized and FUNDED Pro-Maduro Demonstrations in MUS...
Drew Holden Drops HUGE Maduro Receipt Right on 'Pack of No-Good Grifters' aka...
BOOM! Venezuelan Journo Straight-Up NUKES Mouth-Breathers Defending Maduro Because They Ha...
Read This TWICE: MN Dept. of Children 'Clears' Fraudulent Somali Daycares, There's Just...
This YOU? X Hands DAMNING Mirror to Former 'Border Czar' Kamala for Trying...

Globe and Mail: The anti-mandate #FreedomConvoy protests in Ottawa 'revealed the ugly side of freedom'

The Globe and Mail has printed plenty of hot takes on the Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa: the paper turned to “activists and academics” to make the case that the protests weren’t “peaceful” because that ignored the “non-violent danger” they posed to citizens. The CBC hasn’t been any better, running a piece with “experts” explaining that the word “freedom” had been co-opted by far-right groups.

Advertisement

The CBC piece is the perfect lead-in to this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin, arguing that the protests exposed “the ugly side of freedom.”

McLachlin writes:

Who sets the limits on our freedoms?

In the first instance, it is our governments – our duly elected representatives in Parliament, and the executive branch that has the responsibility to maintain “peace, order and good government,” to quote the Constitution, for the good of all. Our governments must draw the difficult lines that mark the limits of freedom in a particular situation. When you must wear a mask. Whether you can cross a border without a vaccine certificate. How many people can attend a party and who gets to go to school.

The heady notion of freedom, defined as the unconstrained right to do what you want free of government limits, serves as a cloak for actions that harm women, men and children who are simply going about their business and trying to do the right thing. Freedom without limits slides imperceptibly into freedom to say and do what you want about people who don’t look like you or talk like you. Sadly, the Ottawa truckers’ convoy has revealed this ugly side of freedom.

Advertisement

McLachlin’s argument, essentially, is that people should accept the limits on freedom that the government sets until they can vote out the government and gain new representation.

Advertisement

Well said.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Your freedom to protest is dependent on what you’re protesting … that’s what this is saying without saying it.

* * *

Update:

The Globe and Mail just won’t quit:

“The extreme harassment of TV reporters is a form of psychological warfare.”


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement