CNN's Jake Tapper Wonders Why More Conservatives Aren't Defending Legacy Media Against Tru...
WaPo Has ALL the Climate Change Alarmist Bases Covered When It Comes to...
CBS News' Margaret Brennan's Assessment of Iranian Nukes Changes Based on What Trump...
Where's the Love? The View Asks the Single Most Idiotic Question (yet) About...
Bill Burr: Maybe If Healthcare Execs Had Just Listened, Luigi Wouldn’t Have Had...
Charles Cooke Won’t Clap As Hannah-Jones ‘Oopsies’ Sacrificing Her Kid to the Cause
DHS Catches Kamala Harris Going Full 'Quiet Part Out Loud' on Removing Noncitizens...
Mehdi Hasan Says He's Now on the Same Page As Bill Kristol 'Thanks...
That’s Eracism!: Stanford University Gets Caught AI-Altering Ad Photo to Make Students Mor...
The Banish Acquisition: Insiders Say Mood at CNN Is Like a Funeral After...
El-Sayed and El-Salad: Dem Enlists Kamala Harris to Win Over ‘Black Birthing People’...
Minister From James Talarico’s Church Admits They’re Not a Belief-Based Church
Since 1986, Geraldo Rivera Has Never Met a Rake He Couldn't Step On
CNN's Brian Stelter Says There Will Almost Certainly Be Layoffs After Paramount Merger
Boston Globe: Queer Community Splintered Over Lesbian Bar That Dropped Strict Mask Mandate

Sam Stein says Wall Street Journal's claim that Biden has done no better than Trump regarding COVID 'lacks any real context'

We’ve already posted President Joe Biden’s tweet from last December saying he was going to “shut down the virus” a couple of times recently, so we’ll trust you remember it. And there was Biden’s campaign promise that he would ask Americans to mask up for just 100 days; that was his plan.

Advertisement

Biden hasn’t shut down the virus by any stretch, and he’s had the advantage of having a couple of vaccines at his disposal since the day he assumed office. On the Wall Street Journal’s opinion page is a piece arguing that Biden has done no better defeating COVID-19 than Trump despite all of the advances in prevention and treatment.

Politico’s Sam Stein says that’s a take that lacks any real context.

Fox News!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Isn’t “lacks context” what the fact-checkers use when they don’t want to accuse someone of lying but can’t ignore the facts?


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement