Sen. Chris Van Hollen Says Act to Ban Stock Trading Would 'Disenfranchise American...
Sean Davis Puts the Final Mushroom Cloud Over NYTimes' 'We Don't Publish Unverified...
Sen. Alex Padilla Calls Out Markwayne Mullin's 'Election Conspiracy Claims About Noncitize...
Senate Dems Block Legislation to Ban Insider Trading, Citing Attached ‘Voter Suppression’...
These Christians Risk Everything to Follow Jesus
Better Off Head? Actor John Cusack’s New High Brows Raise Low-Brow Laughs Online
End Wokeness Shows How Fast the Copy and Paste Hijacking Spin Made the...
NYTimes' Defense of Hijacking Headline Is the 'Most Unintentionally Hilarious Tweet of All...
Iran's Hail Mary Plea Just Gave Trump Everything He Needed
Socialism Is Real. It's Dangerous. And They're Organizing.
Magills Lays Out Left’s Daily Planner: Condemn Cornell 7 at Noon, Defend the...
Federal Grand Jury Indicts Foreign Nationals for Doing the Thing Dems and Media...
'I Did It for Palestine': Kyrsten Sinema’s Ex Turns Her Pricey Art Collection...
MS NOW Journo Stresses That Motive Is Still Unknown After Attempt to Crash...
Mahmoud Khalil Says America Broke Its Promise — Deport Him Quick Since It's...

Soledad O'Brien gives us 'genuinely the best self own' this year trying to defend the 1619 Project

You probably know that despite historians calling for “prominent corrections” to the New York Times’ 1619 Project, editor Nikole Hannah-Jones won a Pulitzer Prize for her work, even though she admitted it’s “not a history” but rather “a challenge to the national narrative.” It’s enough of a history for schools across the country to be integrating the print version into their history curriculums, though.

Advertisement

In his latest column for the Times, Bret Stephens — the closest thing the Times has to a conservative columnist — takes on the New York Times Magazine’s 1619 Project, saying that “virtually every writer in the project seems to sing from the same song sheet, alienating other potential supporters of the project and polarizing national debate.”

Soledad O’Brien popped her head in to suggest that Stephens is just jealous of Hannah-Jones’ Pulitzer.

Or not.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Here’s O’Brien’s witty rejoinder to prove that no, she was not owned.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos