Brandon Morse, an editor over at Twitchy sister-site RedState, has a great question, and it’s one we’d really like to hear a definitive answer to. We know that there have been calls for the impeachment of President Trump since before he was inaugurated, and the reasons have covered quite the spectrum.
Take, for example, impeachment-happy Rep. Al Green. In Sept. 2017, he wanted Trump impeached for saying he wished NFL owners would fire players who took a knee during the anthem. That November, he wanted Trump impeached for retweeting “anti-Muslim” videos from Britain First. And then, of course, there was the matter of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia, which the Mueller report concluded never happened, so that suddenly became obstruction of justice.
Now it seems the House Democrats want to impeach Trump for pressuring Ukraine into investigating the deal with Joe Biden’s son, Hunter.
Brandon Morse wants to know — and so do we — what exactly are we impeaching him for again?
What are we impeaching Trump for?
— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 24, 2019
— Eye on Politics (@EyeOnPolitics) September 24, 2019
for winning the election.
— Don'tBanShan (@shansmith) September 24, 2019
Duh. For winning in 2016.
— Matthew (@GreatAgainMatty) September 24, 2019
Winning an election he wasn't supposed to win.
— PattiD05 (@PattiD05) September 24, 2019
He won. That’s it.
— Little Larry Sellers (@SpawnOfDanelaw) September 24, 2019
Winning the election……
— Stacy Allen (@StacyAl44006416) September 24, 2019
— Bradley Onion (@86postmodernism) September 24, 2019
Winning the election.
— JonBownePolitix (@JonBownePolitix) September 24, 2019
— Vanon (@V4Victoryanon) September 24, 2019
For being Trump.
— IronJawedAngel (@AngelJawed) September 24, 2019
"Because if we don't impeach, he will be re-elected."
We have heard as much from some Democrats & with their new system of American Jurisprudence we only need rumors from unnamed sources to be found guilty until proven innocent.?
— Kicking Govt. Mule #299,897,983 (@Az61Ronin) September 24, 2019
Because they can’t come up with a candidate that’s not batshit crazy.
— Douglas Karr (@douglaskarr) September 24, 2019
No one knows. Pelosi is now saying that a quid pro quo is not required…which seems odd since it's the only way his interaction was illegal. She realizes her bluff has been called. Goalposts are being picked up and flung into the ocean at this point.
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) September 24, 2019
For a phone call? No, for a complaint by someone, I think.
— SD (@SDannny44) September 24, 2019
Some people heard some things.
— Leonidas Xanflorp (@LXanflorp) September 24, 2019
The Bidens have corrupt dealings in & with Ukraine and were under investigation. The Trump Admin took interest, and the American left perceive his interest as constituting election interference via a foreign power. Of course, held to this standard, the entire Dem party is guilty.
— Joe MacKinnon (@JTMacKinnon) September 24, 2019
Apparently trying to expose crimes of big government and corrupted officals like biden. Or for saying investigate biden
— Eric ? (@theycanseeme) September 24, 2019
Dems say he did what Joe Biden admitted to doing.
— ★Gerilenn★ (@Gerilenn) September 24, 2019
Sometimes he is a meany on Twitter.
— Gladysbelle (@FelixaRose) September 24, 2019
Orange man bad.
— Lisa ? (@LisaBelle_B) September 24, 2019
I asked this same question earlier…
— BradintheATL (@BAC30076) September 24, 2019
Response from the left: pic.twitter.com/nMLEYQbbRy
— The Chad (@jackson_chad) September 24, 2019
Bad hair, covfefe and knee slap signalling the first lady.
— Stan Mattman ن (@stanblessleah) September 24, 2019
“AbUsE oF pOwEr” is what CNN is now saying
— justin vacoochie (@justinvacoochie) September 24, 2019
That is highly classified. Strictly on a need-to-fantasize basis.
— Lex et Libertas (@Lex_et_Libertas) September 24, 2019
Because….shuffles cards….ORANGE MAN BAD.
— Tony On A Boat ⚓ (@seamustdog) September 24, 2019
One count of orange man bad.
— Vern Demerest (@TxAv8r) September 24, 2019
That doesn't matter. Remember, it's just the seriousness of the charge.
— Casey Wiseman (@Casemat) September 24, 2019
They’re still trying to figure that out themselves.
— Drew ??♂️ (@mrdic) September 24, 2019
Maybe we’ll find out for sure this afternoon, once Speaker Nancy Pelosi puts together a special committee to handle the impeachment inquiry to find out what Trump promised Ukraine in the phone call whose transcript will be released unredacted Wednesday.
Bluff CALLED! Trump announcing he’ll release Ukraine transcript has media tripping all over themselves MOVING goalposts https://t.co/AcP19F6Npx
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) September 24, 2019