Bernie Sanders Says It’s Embarrassing How Little the President Knows About the Dangers...
'FactPost' Claims Pennsylvania Has Reported Four Measles Deaths This Year; Shapiro Piles o...
Jake Tapper Thinks CA’s COVID Response Is Being Used As a Cudgel on...
Boston Herald: Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Now Getting the Negative Attention He Deserves
NYPost Looks Into Anthropic CEO's Woke Handpicked AI Watchdog Group
'Shady As F**k': Pro-Talarico Super PAC Finds ‘Roundabout Way of Paying People for...
NYT Blames 'Editing Error' for Saying Israelis See Themselves As the Victims of...
Watching Kash Patel Infuriate Cory Booker (While Getting in a Dig at Schiff)...
Athletic Scholarships Are Scarce. A Well-Rounded Kid Shouldn’t Be the Sacrifice
Chalk Up Another Massive L for Newsom: TMZ Reports That Paramount Is Ditching...
'Probably Nothing!' L.A. Mayor Karen Bass Quit This Board Right Before Today's HUGE...
Kansas Man Arrested by Florida Police Over Alleged Plot to Kill Ben Shapiro...
Stadiums Banned Macklemore After Antisemitic Rants ... Dearborn Mayor Rolls Out the Welcom...
CNN Asks Senate Candidate Dan Osborn to Confirm This Is His Voice Insulting...
Hidden Camera Footage Catches Talarico SuperPAC Paying For Votes

Washington Post: House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism is Nancy Pelosi's 'most shameful decision'

Twitchy’s already covered Slate’s hot take on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic statements (she’s excused because she’s a little ignorant and probably doesn’t realize what she’s saying could be considered offensive), but it’s the Washington Post that has really stepped up Tuesday:

Advertisement

You’ll notice one of those three headlines falls under the opinion section and was written by Paul Waldman, who considers it “shameful” of Speaker Nancy Pelosi to bring to the floor a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism (and not even mentioning Omar by name).

Sure, her current term as Speaker of the House is only a couple of months old, but her “most shameful decision”?

It’s like she’s acknowledging there’s anti-Semitism in her own party (rather than just ignoring it). Waldman writes:

Now, back to Omar. Here’s the truth: The whole purpose of the Democrats’ resolution is to enforce dual loyalty not among Jews, but among members of Congress, to make sure that criticism of Israel is punished in the most visible way possible. This, of course, includes Omar. As it happens, this punishment of criticism of Israel is exactly what the freshman congresswoman was complaining about, and has on multiple occasions. The fact that no one seems to acknowledge that this is her complaint shows how spectacularly disingenuous Omar’s critics are being.

You may have noticed that almost no one uses “dual loyalty” as a way of questioning whether Jews are loyal to the United States anymore. Why has it almost disappeared as an anti-Semitic slur? Because, over the last three decades, support for Israel has become increasingly associated with conservative evangelicals and the Republican Party.

Advertisement

If support for Israel has become increasingly associated with the Republican Party (which it has, and good for them), why are House Democrats introducing this resolution? To bolster Republican support of Israel? Or because they’re seeing what Waldman refuses to see?

There wouldn’t even be a resolution if Omar hadn’t created the need for it.

Advertisement

So a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism in general is a bad thing?


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement