Zohran Mamdani Appoints Man Who Defended Mahmoud Khalil as NYC Chief Counsel
Covenant Shooter Didn't Want to Kill the Black Community, Which Is in Despair...
'Who Needs the Americans?': The Future Is a European Army
Jennifer Welch Jumps on Anti-Israel Conspiracy Bandwagon
Even Jack Smith Has Helped Make Lib Journos' Fawning over Jan. 6 Committee's...
Minnesota Childcare Director Goes a Little Off-Script: 'There Is Fraud'
MAZE Flashback to 2018: Fraud Is So Widespread People Are Buying Shares in...
Minnesota Mom Freezes Up After Reading Statement Saying, 'I Understand, Fraud Is Bad'
This Brief Summary of CNN's MN Daycare Fraud Investigation NAILS the Pitiful State...
Report: More Than 40 Daycares Opened the Same Day by the Same Somali...
Billionaire in Blessings: Reflecting on a Year Full of Love, Laughter, and Florida...
Manager of Daycare That Was Broken Into Says the Attention Has Been Frightening...
BONJOUR! Bari Weiss Has the PERFECT Response to Fake Journalist George Clooney's Criticism...
CNN Reporter Made a Few Phone Calls in Effort to Discredit Nick Shirley...
Mike Rowe Shares a Wonderful Christmas 'Carol' That We Can All Enjoy ......

Washington Post: House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism is Nancy Pelosi's 'most shameful decision'

Twitchy’s already covered Slate’s hot take on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic statements (she’s excused because she’s a little ignorant and probably doesn’t realize what she’s saying could be considered offensive), but it’s the Washington Post that has really stepped up Tuesday:

Advertisement

You’ll notice one of those three headlines falls under the opinion section and was written by Paul Waldman, who considers it “shameful” of Speaker Nancy Pelosi to bring to the floor a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism (and not even mentioning Omar by name).

Sure, her current term as Speaker of the House is only a couple of months old, but her “most shameful decision”?

It’s like she’s acknowledging there’s anti-Semitism in her own party (rather than just ignoring it). Waldman writes:

Now, back to Omar. Here’s the truth: The whole purpose of the Democrats’ resolution is to enforce dual loyalty not among Jews, but among members of Congress, to make sure that criticism of Israel is punished in the most visible way possible. This, of course, includes Omar. As it happens, this punishment of criticism of Israel is exactly what the freshman congresswoman was complaining about, and has on multiple occasions. The fact that no one seems to acknowledge that this is her complaint shows how spectacularly disingenuous Omar’s critics are being.

You may have noticed that almost no one uses “dual loyalty” as a way of questioning whether Jews are loyal to the United States anymore. Why has it almost disappeared as an anti-Semitic slur? Because, over the last three decades, support for Israel has become increasingly associated with conservative evangelicals and the Republican Party.

Advertisement

If support for Israel has become increasingly associated with the Republican Party (which it has, and good for them), why are House Democrats introducing this resolution? To bolster Republican support of Israel? Or because they’re seeing what Waldman refuses to see?

There wouldn’t even be a resolution if Omar hadn’t created the need for it.

Advertisement

So a House resolution denouncing anti-Semitism in general is a bad thing?


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement