Dem Senator (and Iranian Regime Propagandist) Chris Murphy Pivots From 'War Crimes' to...
Culture Clubbed: MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell Says Trump’s Second Election Already Crushed...
'I'm With Iran': John Pavlovitz and the Left's Long Tradition of Siding With...
Did Iran Cave or Was This TACO Tuesday? CNN's Erin Burnett Apparently Disappointed
From Tampon Tim to Hypocrite-in-Chief: Walz's Trump Attack Backfires Spectacularly
Zohran Mamdani’s Office Says New York’s History Is One of Colonization and Racial...
Society Thrives on Marriage and Birth Celebrations— Not Birthday Extravaganzas for the Sin...
Rep. María Salazar Hopes Her Dignity Act Eventually Leads to a Path to...
As Crime Explodes, Minneapolis Leaders Go Full Sodom: Legal Bathhouses Incoming
Politico Wants You to Meet Harmeet Dhillon, the Woman Who Thinks Civil Rights...
AP: Iran's Supreme National Security Council Has Accepted a Two-Week Ceasefire
Video Shows Illegal Wanted for Murder Attempting to Run Down ICE Agents, Getting...
Rubio Tuesday
James Woods Calls Out Jennifer Newsom for Telling Prisoners Their Crimes Were Probably...
Scum of the Earth Stick Together: Cheating Ruben Gallego Defends Eric Swalwell Amid...

MSNBC analyst finds Cherokee Nation's statement disavowing Elizabeth Warren 'problematic'

As Twitchy reported, not long after Sen. Elizabeth Warren spiked the ball when a DNA test showed she could have as little as 1/1024th Native American heritage — less than the average white American — the Cherokee Nation put out a statement saying that “using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong.”

Advertisement

We wondered which media outlet would be first to try to discredit the Cherokee Nation, and we think that honor goes to a Washington Post reporter who did some digging and found that back in 2012, the head of the Cherokee Nation “defended Warren and stressed that she never claimed to be a card-carrying member” — guess he never got his copy of the “Pow Wow Chow” cookbook. And this was before the DNA test fiasco.

The media is still circling the wagons around Warren, and now MSNBC analyst Zerlina Maxwell has called the Cherokee Nation’s statement ridiculous and problematic.

What’s so problematic about the statement? Maxwell explained to host Craig Melvin:

I think that while the rollout of the DNA test and the decision to do a DNA test to be able to, quote, “prove” that she is part Cherokee, may not have been the best method. I also think that the Cherokee Nation’s response was problematic because it actually ignores the fact that DNA testing historically has been used to exclude black natives from tribal affiliation. And so, that history has been completely lost in this entire conversation, and that’s potentially very unfortunate.

Advertisement

So whose DNA testing, exactly, has been used to exclude black natives from tribal affiliation? Maxwell’s obviously insinuating the tests are racist, and since there’s no one else to finger, she might as well suggest that the Cherokee Nation’s statement was “problematic,” i.e., racist.

https://twitter.com/96gq/status/1053065819343642624

Yeah, and Maxwell’s not even the first we’ve heard of.

Advertisement

Can we just ask … why is anyone in America even still suggesting that Warren is in any way, shape, or form Native American?

Would it be too much for the media to lay off the Cherokee Nation and maybe fact-check this list of Warren’s lies about her heritage instead?


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement