Ann Arbor Removes Last Neighborhood Watch Sign, Ending Part of City’s Troubled Racist...
Newsom Press Office Has Total Meltdown Over Supreme Court Gerrymandering Ruling and Florid...
ABC News: SCOTUS Considering Whether Trump 'Unlawfully Ordered' Migrants Sent Home
Maine Dem Senate Candidate With Swastika Ink Furious Supreme Court Won't Force Race-Based...
Marc Elias’ Interpretation of SCOTUS VRA Decision Is Intellectually Dishonest and Wrong
Local News Says FBI Used a Battering Ram to Raid a Daycare in...
She Seems Nice: Seattle’s Socialist Nepo Mayor Cackles 'BYE' as Wealth Flees Her...
Obama Already Knows the Motive for Today's SCOTUS Ruling, Still Looking for WHCD...
Sen. Raphael Warnock: SCOTUS Has Gutted the Protections Civil Rights Protesters Spilled Bl...
Florida State Rep. Storms House Aisle With Bullhorn to Rage Against New District...
The View Panelists Quickly Became James Comey's Lawyers When Alina Habba Said the...
Cluck Around and Find Out: Why Rotisserie Chicken on SNAP Went Full Slippery...
Supreme Court: No More Racial Gerrymandering; Mehdi Hasan: Time to Rig the Court...
Tim Walz Tried to Save His Career But Kash Patel Made Him Regret...
'No Radical Footprint': NPR Dismisses WHCD Shooter’s Manifesto Because It Read Like MSNBC...

ACLU memo: Free speech cases may take backseat to organization's equality and justice work

Robby Soave at Reason reports Thursday on a leaked ACLU memo that suggests the ACLU’s defense of free speech might be weighed against the organization’s other commitments, such as social justice, racial equality, and women’s rights.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1009789324492197889

Soave writes:

It’s hard to see this as anything other than a cowardly retreat from a full-throated defense of the First Amendment. Moving forward, when deciding whether to take a free speech case, the organization will consider “factors such as the (present and historical) context of the proposed speech; the potential effect on marginalized communities; the extent to which the speech may assist in advancing the goals of white supremacists or others whose views are contrary to our values; and the structural and power inequalities in the community in which the speech will occur.”

Soave notes that “the memo also makes clear that the ACLU has zero interest in defending First Amendment rights in conjunction with Second Amendment rights. If controversial speakers intend to carry weapons, the ACLU ‘will generally not represent them.'”

What a shocker.

Advertisement

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/tms1792/status/1009839401906647041


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement