Gee, what would give anyone the impression that Hillary Clinton hasn’t gracefully accepted her 2016 election loss to Donald Trump?
Could it be her endless book tour where she spends each stop talking about another reason she lost? Her refusal to accept that she was responsible for her loss? Her joke that she’d be going as “president” for Halloween in 2017? Her ruminations about being president on “Earth 2”?
For a New York Times reporter, Hillary’s recent appearance with husband Bill in Little Rock was reason enough to believe she still hasn’t gotten over it.
At an event in Little Rock, it was clear that Bill and Hillary Clinton have not gotten over her loss to President Trump https://t.co/LBJ6dPkydv
— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 20, 2017
Can someone please identify the journalistic purpose of this headline? https://t.co/CvDfhVqJNC
— Peter Daou (@peterdaou) November 20, 2017
We think what the headline writer was trying to say was that it was clear at an event in Little Rock that Bill and Hillary and their supporters still haven’t gotten over her loss to Donald Trump. Then again, the man asking the New York Times to justify its headline also co-founded Hillary fan-site Verrit, so it’s not as though he’s moved on either.
There is none. https://t.co/yf6AOLl6cT
— Covfefe_au_lait (@HappyinaMini) November 20, 2017
None detected … https://t.co/GP8bMagt9a
— no longer a person (@smoothpolitics) November 20, 2017
There is no purpose. https://t.co/FutT2IdTqK
— John Pieratt (@jonpier) November 20, 2017
— Stephen (@stephenbottomly) November 20, 2017
It's to remind us all that the NYT really doesn't like the Clintons. And helped give us Trump to prove it. https://t.co/bWKcdXEVxK
— David McLemore (@dave_in_sa) November 20, 2017
For crying out loud she can “get over it” whenever & however she wishes!
— frances renfer 1959 (@frenfer123) November 20, 2017
— hayley a stein (@hayleyastein) November 20, 2017
Better headline: Hillary should never get over the fact the election was stolen by a narcissist criminal conspirator and ignoramous who does Putin’s bidding and doesn’t understand how government works.
— Kristen Lazarian (@kristenlazarian) November 20, 2017
Loss? The election was STOLEN
— Alexandra #Resist (@alexespind) November 20, 2017
Just another vicious jab at the popular vote president.
— Cathy Glaesman (@CathyGlaesman) November 20, 2017
Yeah, how dare the New York Times suggest Clinton’s supporters still haven’t gotten over her loss. Preposterous.
— Impeach Trump Now (@Jack_Stone_818) November 20, 2017
— Marilyn Mangan (@mangan_marilyn) November 20, 2017
It was bad enough to "lose" to DJT. But to now have confirmation that the campaign was truly rigged on multiple fronts…she is very justly upset — especially since she said there was Russian interference. She was cheated. We were cheated. The NYT should give up their vendetta. https://t.co/K7M815VXx5
— Gemma L. Smith (@gemmadimension1) November 20, 2017
— Todd Bruns (@tabruns2015) November 20, 2017
— Barbara Barnaby (@BarnabyBarbara) November 20, 2017
It’s the NYT, why I cancelled subscription.
— Liz (@the_liz) November 20, 2017
Doing so today. Clean up your act NYTimes.
— Donny Dumpty (@SayNo2Dumpy) November 20, 2017
To change your comments display name, click here.