Monday Morning Meme Madness
Spoil Sport: Campaign Manager Blames Trump Culture for Sporting Shows Dropping Kamala
January 6 Committee Democrat Won’t Refuse Biden Pardon Despite Saying He Broke No...
Definitely Defeated: Kamala Serves Up Repetitive Word Salad at Annual DNC Holiday Dinner
Trophy Treat: Pop-Tarts Unwraps Tasty Toasty College Football Bowl Prize
Host of Cringemas Present: Celebrating Our Final Kamala-Cackling Holiday Season
State of the Chart: Chris Cillizza Blind to Fox News Post-Election Viewership Rise
Poll Position: Pollster Who Had Kamala Winning Iowa is Refuting Election Interference Clai...
Kamala Eyeing Full-Court Shot at Presidency Despite California Governorship Layup
ABC News Sends ‘Regrets’ But No Apology for Trump Rape Lies Spread by...
Seven Years Ago, Disney Enacted Order 66 on the Movie Industry (but We...
Israel Closing Embassy in Ireland, Citing 'Extreme Anti-Israel Polices' of Government
Infectious Disease Doc Gets WRECKED for Calling Lockdowns a 'Necessary Evil'
J. K. Rowling Pitches an Amazing New Action Series
BUT, BUT, BUT: Yet Another Democrat Defends Murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO

Nailed it: Michael Ian Black exposes the party that doesn't believe in science in epic rant

Posts like these can be no fun to write sometimes, now that social media has compelled all entertainers to share their political views online. We remember finding comedian Michael Ian Black kind of funny in that thing he was in that one time, so you’d think someone who makes a living from their wit would throw better punches than these.

Advertisement

In short: Republicans don’t believe in science.

Glad he threw in that “literally,” although when we think of people keeping politics and science completely separate, the group that comes to mind is the group who held an intimate Wiccan prayer ritual in Portland in support of Bernie Sanders.

Hang on … this rant goes on a bit.

We don’t know — this Democratic Congressman thinks he knows something about science. Check the lab coat.

Can we stop for just a minute, since there’s a recurring theme here? What did it mean when candidate Hillary Clinton said at her acceptance speech in Philadelphia, “I believe in science”? Seriously, what did that mean? She believes in the scientific method? She believes “settled” (i.e., generally accepted) theories?

Advertisement

Or did it mean that if you are wearing a white lab coat and tell her something, she’s compelled to believe you? Were she elected, would she surround herself with the same high-profile scientific minds like Bill Nye the failed improv comic and his assistant Clock Boy to advise her on policy.

Sorry to go on, but this really grates. Everyone knows that “believing in science” is shorthand for believing in man-made climate change, and most people’s belief in that is predicated on consensus — and even that study that found that consensus can be shot full of holes.

So now, ironically, it’s the people who are still asking questions about the world around us who are branded the science “deniers.”

We warned you; this goes on:

Disbelieving in data when the data’s been cooked is a good thing.

Hang on; here’s comes the hard turn into “faith” vs. “science” — like any good roller coaster, you know it’s coming, but you still get a queasy feeling every time you round it.

Advertisement

OK, forget faith: ask an atheist scientist when life begins — at conception, viability, or birth — and then tell us politics doesn’t enter the equation.

Wait, he’s not done. Now he’s on to “junk science” … like the study that “proved” 97 percent of scientists agree on climate change being man-made.

Advertisement

We know, right? After all of those attempts to set up nations where there are no economic classes went so well, too.

Guess that means Micheal Ian Black won’t be going for coffee with us anytime soon. It’s over. Or maybe not; what if we set up a science fair … Michael Ian Black vs. whomever on the Twitchy staff has a white lab coat. Baking soda and vinegar volcanoes at dawn.

Advertisement

Here’s our theory: people say they “believe in science” to sound smart, because “I believe in science” has no inherent meaning. Science doesn’t care if you believe in it or not. Science doesn’t change based on consensus or faith or politics … and yet some political types think it does.

https://twitter.com/AdamBaldwin/status/906599610268844032

There another scientific theory that’s been floated: Trump Derangement Syndrome does put stress on comedy writers to be funny.

https://twitter.com/r_kibblehouse/status/906602284859060225

https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/906597360071045121

He’s an actor … but he’s not a Republican, so he believes in science. You might work in science, but he believes in science. You know what believing in something you can’t prove is? Faith.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/906599678950694913

https://twitter.com/CounterMoonbat/status/906603421385592833

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement