Pete Buttigieg and Penn. Dem Candidate Get Authenticity Coaching While Shooting Campaign V...
Sen. Patty Murray Asks Lee Zeldin If He Seriously Believes ’There Is Abortion...
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Protests Too Much, Posts His Alcohol Use Disorders Self-Test...
Added Last-Minute as Moderator, Cenk Uygur Triggers Panel Walkout With Anti-Israel Tirade
The View Lefties Are Pretty Upset That Billy Bob Thornton Won't Help Save...
Krystal Ball's Master Plan: Put Shock-Collar Hasan on Every Dem Stage – GOP...
Xavier Becerra Tried to Bury Biden's Lost Kids
Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen's Spin After Kash Patel Wrecked Him Over Drinking...
Break Out the BS Detector: Chris Murphy Claims Iran Is Two to Three...
EXPOSED: Leading Michigan Senate Dem Abdul El-Sayed Lied for Years About Being a...
Bernie Sanders Congratulating Mayor Mamdani for This Perfectly Sums Up Socialist-Style 'Su...
Mehdi Hasan Asks When It Became OK for a President to Call a...
Watch a Bunch of 'Journalists' Just Nod Along As AOC Pushes BS Spin...
Explosive Senate Hearing Today: CIA Insider Testifies Fauci 'Injected Himself' to Kill Lab...
Chutzpah Level: Expert. Alex Soros Demands You Ignore His Dad's Jew-Hating Proxies

Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempts to illuminate facts on another movie and people are less than bowled over by his 'science'

With Walt Disney’s ”Frozen 2” having become more successful a number of questions resulted. Why are people braving the winter weather to go watch a film about the frigid conditions? Why do the two female voice actresses switch characters to sing the songs? Just how many products can Disney brand to the film???

Advertisement

One inevitable question also with a film this popular arrives: How will celebrity astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempt to ruin the film with his cinematic hot takes? Tyson, as we have come to understand, enjoys arriving on the scene with a pithy science-based rejoiner for films to overexplain things and annoy fans. This time Neil delivers, but in far less impressive fashion.

This seems underwhelming. For all of the mysticism and questionable physics we witness, Tyson was only able to find an issue with the appearance of a character — in a cartoon?

Advertisement

This is a common issue with Neil’s entertainment quips — they only work if you refuse to understand the films are presenting an exaggerated reality.

This would make more sense than this descriptive correction he offered up. Considering the things that take place in this animated fantasy it seems taking scientific shots at appearances comes off as somewhat shallow.

Advertisement

There may have been a time when these wry observations were somewhat amusing. This is just half-hearted scrounging for something to post.

There is just one response to Mr. Tyson.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement