Haley Stevens Holds Her Own Against UNHINGED El-Sayed Fan Threatening Her With the...
'Fear,' 'Terrifying': How Americans Really Feel About the Rise of Socialism
So It BEGINS: Fairfax County Prosecutor Throws Abigail Spanberger Under the BUS Over...
Kamala Harris to Campaign for Abdul El-Sayed in MI (Did the Rogers Campaign...
Clancy Holdout Speaks Up — > Eight 'Activist' Jurors Came in Ready to...
Scott Jennings Turns Abby Phillip Into a Sputtering Mess in Heated Debate on...
Lesbian Minister at James Talarico's Church Brags About Him Fooling People As a...
MS NOW Hosts BEG Hasan Piker to Stop Being Himself Until After the...
WOOF! Dems Are Gonna Have to Do Some SERIOUS Damage Control After Hasan...
No WONDER They Pled the FIFTH: NEW House Report Drops ActBlue's DAMNING 2024...
El-Sayed Will 'Get the Money Out of Politics' by Raking in Donations From...
Unsound Barrier: Dem Shri Thanedar’s X Post Shows He Doesn’t Get the ‘Ins...
Jessica Tarlov Didn’t Know Biden Lied About ‘Secure Border’ Until Fox News Drone...
Tapped Out Tapper: CNN’s Latest Attempt to Lure in Viewers As Bad As...
Tiny Village to Be Dumping Ground for Asylum-Seekers Votes to Become Independent From...

Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempts to illuminate facts on another movie and people are less than bowled over by his 'science'

With Walt Disney’s ”Frozen 2” having become more successful a number of questions resulted. Why are people braving the winter weather to go watch a film about the frigid conditions? Why do the two female voice actresses switch characters to sing the songs? Just how many products can Disney brand to the film???

Advertisement

One inevitable question also with a film this popular arrives: How will celebrity astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempt to ruin the film with his cinematic hot takes? Tyson, as we have come to understand, enjoys arriving on the scene with a pithy science-based rejoiner for films to overexplain things and annoy fans. This time Neil delivers, but in far less impressive fashion.

This seems underwhelming. For all of the mysticism and questionable physics we witness, Tyson was only able to find an issue with the appearance of a character — in a cartoon?

Advertisement

This is a common issue with Neil’s entertainment quips — they only work if you refuse to understand the films are presenting an exaggerated reality.

This would make more sense than this descriptive correction he offered up. Considering the things that take place in this animated fantasy it seems taking scientific shots at appearances comes off as somewhat shallow.

Advertisement

There may have been a time when these wry observations were somewhat amusing. This is just half-hearted scrounging for something to post.

There is just one response to Mr. Tyson.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement