Democrats Continue Endangering America With Shutdowns
Elon Musk Makes a TSA Offer That the Senate Dems (NOT Including John...
Excruciating! Georgia Chief Justice DESTROYS Attorney Over Citing Non-Existent Cases (and...
'Polling on This Must Be Brutal': Even the MSM Isn't Cooperating With the...
Jake Tapper's New Broadcast Office Decor Is TOTALLY Not a Metaphor for CNN
Cynical Publius Reveals Trump's Greatest Superpower, Courtesy of Anne Applebaum and The At...
Jim Acosta Warns That 'Partisan Hacks' Will Take Over CNN Due to Paramount/Warner...
CNN’s Solution to Low Ratings Is Enormous Mics for Anderson Cooper and Office...
'Politics May Overshadow His Legacy': Variety's Chuck Norris Headline Gets Ratio'ed to the...
Hypocrites in Havana: Leftists Sing Celia Cruz's Guantanamera While Ignoring Her Exile by...
Don Lemon to Gavin Newsom: America Shoots Protesters Just Like Iran – No...
'People Are Starting to Notice': Viral Close-Up of Karoline Leavitt Triggers Outrage Cycle...
Internal Polling Come Out? Senate Dems Are Lying Even Harder About Blame for...
Defiant Statement from Invisible Iranian Supreme Leader: Media Fails to Mention He Hasn't...
Ilhan Omar’s Nepo-Baby Princess Pilgrimages to Cuba to Cosplay as a Revolutionary...

Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempts to illuminate facts on another movie and people are less than bowled over by his 'science'

With Walt Disney’s ”Frozen 2” having become more successful a number of questions resulted. Why are people braving the winter weather to go watch a film about the frigid conditions? Why do the two female voice actresses switch characters to sing the songs? Just how many products can Disney brand to the film???

Advertisement

One inevitable question also with a film this popular arrives: How will celebrity astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempt to ruin the film with his cinematic hot takes? Tyson, as we have come to understand, enjoys arriving on the scene with a pithy science-based rejoiner for films to overexplain things and annoy fans. This time Neil delivers, but in far less impressive fashion.

This seems underwhelming. For all of the mysticism and questionable physics we witness, Tyson was only able to find an issue with the appearance of a character — in a cartoon?

Advertisement

This is a common issue with Neil’s entertainment quips — they only work if you refuse to understand the films are presenting an exaggerated reality.

This would make more sense than this descriptive correction he offered up. Considering the things that take place in this animated fantasy it seems taking scientific shots at appearances comes off as somewhat shallow.

Advertisement

There may have been a time when these wry observations were somewhat amusing. This is just half-hearted scrounging for something to post.

There is just one response to Mr. Tyson.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement