While Walz & Frey Call Protesters 'Protecting Neighbors,' DHS Reveals Criminal Illegals Am...
Saint Paul High School Walkout to Protest ICE Turns Into a Brawl
Say Her Name: Kada Scott Killed After Philly DA Krasner Dropped Charges —...
'Bad Decision'! Ron DeSantis Reminds Anti-ICE Mobs Why Florida Is NOT Tim Walz's...
Emmanuel Macron Says the French Military Is on Its Way to Denmark and...
Nick Shirley Exposes a SHOCKING Cash-Smuggling Scheme at U.S. Airports — Tim Walz is...
NBC News Hacks Get Help Fixing Their Headline About an ICE Shooting in...
Minneapolis Insurrection: Leaders Defy Federal Law – Stephen Miller Warns It's Time to...
Minnesota State Sen. Says Attacking ICE Agents With a Shovel Is Just 'Helping...
Karoline Leavitt Nuked WH Journo Pushing Dem Talking Points About ICE (the Look...
Epic FAIL! Mayor Jacob Frey Heroically Omits KEY Deets in Meltdown Thread About...
Fox News Digs Up Brutal Old CNN Segment They Don't Want You to...
Rep. Eric Swalwell Says This Minneapolis Man 'Is ALL OF US' (Then Finds...
HA! Wonder WHY: X Points and LAUGHS at Tim Walz Who SUDDENLY Wants...
DataRepublican and Walter Curt 'Follow the Money' and EXPOSE Huge Somali Fraud Op...

Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempts to illuminate facts on another movie and people are less than bowled over by his 'science'

With Walt Disney’s ”Frozen 2” having become more successful a number of questions resulted. Why are people braving the winter weather to go watch a film about the frigid conditions? Why do the two female voice actresses switch characters to sing the songs? Just how many products can Disney brand to the film???

Advertisement

One inevitable question also with a film this popular arrives: How will celebrity astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson attempt to ruin the film with his cinematic hot takes? Tyson, as we have come to understand, enjoys arriving on the scene with a pithy science-based rejoiner for films to overexplain things and annoy fans. This time Neil delivers, but in far less impressive fashion.

This seems underwhelming. For all of the mysticism and questionable physics we witness, Tyson was only able to find an issue with the appearance of a character — in a cartoon?

Advertisement

This is a common issue with Neil’s entertainment quips — they only work if you refuse to understand the films are presenting an exaggerated reality.

This would make more sense than this descriptive correction he offered up. Considering the things that take place in this animated fantasy it seems taking scientific shots at appearances comes off as somewhat shallow.

Advertisement

There may have been a time when these wry observations were somewhat amusing. This is just half-hearted scrounging for something to post.

There is just one response to Mr. Tyson.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement