'The Golden State Is eating Its Golden Geese' California Defaults on Loan: Businesses...
Rescue Party: The Dems Desperate Search for a Normal 2028 Presidential Candidate Begins
Daytime Dysfunction: 'The View' Continues to Give ABC's Lawyers MAJOR Headaches
Literally NO ONE Is Asking for This: CBS News Insists 'Some' Voters Are...
Heaven on Earth: Take a Glimpse Inside the Restored Notre Dame Cathedral
Unpopular Opinion: Rand Paul Warns Trump Against Using Military to Deport Illegals, Gets...
Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida AG Pam Bondi for Attorney General
Bob Casey Jr Finally Concedes to Dave McCormick in Pennsylvania Senate Race
This TOTALLY Did Not Happen! Climate Activist Says Hurricanes Convinced His Barber Climate...
LET THEM FIGHT: Cenk Uygur Calls Out Joy Behar and 'The View' and...
Daily Mail: We're All Gonna Die From Climate Change! (In 75 Years, That...
'You'll See Things Our Way': Jaguar DOUBLES DOWN on Cringe Ad With Vaguely...
Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan Will Have Netanyahu Arrested If He Enters the City
Biden's America: NFL Issues Security Alert for Players Regarding S. American Crime Syndica...
Karine Jean-Pierre Explains How Much Cheaper Your Thanksgiving Meal Is This Year Thanks...

Locked and loaded: WATCH '60 Minutes' takes aim at a HUGE piece of gun legislation

On Sunday night, “60 Minutes” did an episode about Concealed Carry Reciprocity, something law-abiding gun owners have been pushing for years. If the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act passed in Congress, states would be forced to recognize one another’s concealed carry permits and licenses. It would be similar to a driver’s license in that sense.

Advertisement

As it currently stands, specific states recognize other state’s licenses. It’s a confusing process for gun owners who are trying to follow the law. They could easily break the law by crossing into another state without even knowing it.

It was obvious throughout their piece that the people behind “60 Minutes” are against Concealed Carry Reciprocity.

And the Twitter debate quickly ensued.

Just because you choose to be unarmed doesn’t mean that everyone else should follow you.

A gun is used to protect you and your life. What if your life is threatened outside of your home but your gun isn’t on you? Then what?

That’s the difference between anti-gunners and law-abiding gun owners. Gun owners want to have the ability to protect anyone and everyone, including those who don’t want them to have a firearm in the first place. Gun control advocates, on the other hand, want people to take their chances.

Advertisement

Would you rather he open carries? Then you’d REALLY be freaked out.

https://twitter.com/PizzaGateFun/status/963168534250573825

^^^TRUTH.

There are other gun rights groups out there, that is true.

LOL. Why? Because families hunt? Because people go to the gun range to practice their shooting skills? Because there are shooting sports?

Oh yeah, that’s right, anything that goes BANG! is bad.

https://twitter.com/2ndAadvocate/status/962906873467949056

Legally, they aren’t supposed to carry a firearm. They don’t follow the laws though, so we know how that will end up.

https://twitter.com/LionFisile/status/962859779600285696

That’s one way of looking at it.

https://twitter.com/ernie2451/status/963072860704079872

Advertisement

Liberals, what do you have to say to young men like Ernie who defend our freedom every day? Sit down, shut up and hand over your gun? Shameful.

EXACTLY.

If you can trust him overseas to defend our freedom, then you can trust him at home to defend your life.

Canadians trying to chime into the debate…

https://twitter.com/Gas8128/status/962987317446156290

As if we needed another reason to carry besides the crazies. But remember this guy.

That’s what our Founding Fathers made sure we had the Second Amendment. They wanted to make sure we have the ability to stand up against a tyrannical government.

In other words: defending the First with the Second.

Advertisement

Heidi, why don’t you ask the number of women who live in HORRIBLE inner-cities, like Chicago, about why having a gun is necessary. How many rapes and homicides happen in the city versus the country? Once you figure that one out, pipe down.

Would have saved us all an hour of our life.

https://twitter.com/bananaDanarama/status/963212909378617346

So we should dictate OUR everyday laws based on what foreigners think? Let that one sink in, Dana.

https://twitter.com/dogsneck/status/962865072501612544

Translation: Make firearms, ammo and every other aspect of owning a gun so expensive that the average Joe can’t afford it. Price them out of it and they’ll go away.

Sound familiar? History taught us otherwise.

Don’t forget Tucson, too.

Advertisement

They cherry picked what they wanted to use.

^^^ THIS. A thousand times THIS.

Every person who legally owns a firearm must go through background checks. No ifs, ands or buts. That’s not something that happens ONLY in gun control loving states. It happens in all 50 states.

Most CCW permits require 4-8 hours of training, depending on the state.

That’s the difference between liberals and conservatives though. Conservatives believe in defending yourself, on not relying on others for your own protection. Liberals would rather give you a whistle and a phone for you to call for help. If something happens to you between when you call and when police arrive, you’re shit out of luck.

Advertisement

Touche!

They want the power, not the duty.

Because these men and women know what happens on the streets.

But there’s nothing wrong with carrying knives or mace around? Got it.

To make matters even MORE interesting: “60 Minutes” failed to use any video from a panel of seven women that they interviewed. One of them works for NRA Headquarters. And they’re being called out for it:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement