Just the other day, John Brennan went on MSNBC and accused DNI head Tulsi Gabbard of 'lying' about intel related to Russia's interference in the 2016 election (as well as the involvement of former President Barack Obama).
Now NBC News, forever circling the wagons to protect their beloved Democratic Party, has run yet another story from yet another CIA official who claims Gabbard is 'lying' about the intel:
Exclusive: The former senior CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election says DNI Tulsi Gabbard and the White House are “lying” when they claim that it was an attempt to sabotage President Trump.…
— NBC News (@NBCNews) July 26, 2025
The latest talking points memo must've dropped, and it includes using the word 'lying' as many times as possible.
Susan Miller, a retired CIA officer who helped lead the team that produced the report about Russia’s actions during the 2016 campaign, told NBC News it was based on credible information that showed Moscow sought to help Trump win the election, but that there was no sign of a conspiracy between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign.
“The director of national intelligence and the White House are lying, again,” Miller said. “We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected.”
She added: “At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time.”
Miller spoke to NBC News after Gabbard alleged Wednesday that the 2017 intelligence assessment was based on “manufactured” information as part of a “treasonous conspiracy” by the Obama administration to undermine Trump and tarnish his electoral victory. Gabbard cited a 2020 report from Republicans on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which she declassified and released this week, that asserted there was insufficient information to conclude Russia had been trying to tip the scales in favor of Trump.
Miller said “it is clear that Trump and his followers have a script they want to follow, despite the facts.”
Recommended
The irony of that last sentence is so thick you could cut it with a knife.
Miller helped produce the report on Russia's actions is now the one saying the report she produced was truthful, when there's ample evidence that the entire thing was manufactured by the Obama administration to derail Donald Trump's presidential campaign (and then his presidency).
Of course they’re saying that. They were complicit.
— IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) July 26, 2025
Is anyone, anywhere, disputing the authenticity of the declassified documents that Tulsi released?
Because if not, you all trying to dispute what everyone can read.
They are not.
It’s not going to surprise you that as we watched you fall for the Russian collusion hoax, 2 impeachments and a raid of their personal residence, we might be inclined to call you liars. Everything you and the Dems do is geared to getting Trump
— Bleu Cheque (@VERBAL_CHANCLA) July 26, 2025
They are so utterly broken by Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Unfortunately for them (and you) Director Gabbard has declassified documents that these people created themselves that prove that they (and you) are lying.
— Whale Psychiatrist ™️ (@k_ovfefe2) July 26, 2025
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
NBC News glossed over that fun little tidbit, didn't they?
So did you take into account this source's personal interest when assessing their potential bias and credibility?
— Jennifer Van Laar (@jenvanlaar) July 26, 2025
Oh, right. You're NBC News https://t.co/ScpIIYLu0f
They did not.
Guilty man pleads innocent!
— Tandy (@dantypo) July 26, 2025
Never heard that before! https://t.co/UTUp1Dl4w2
Never!
"We had the intel."
— Tweetoleon (@Tweetoleon) July 26, 2025
--guy who was handed phony intel https://t.co/N5yU8gMgVI
And NBC News takes her at her word.
"We had the intel" yet the evidence Tulsi is releasing shows that's a lie, which should've been your headline yet you went with this bulls**t instead. https://t.co/jtgKFuquCc
— Joe (@JoeC1776) July 26, 2025
That's NBC 'News' for ya.
She also said it was based upon credible information.
— MizDonna (@MizDonna69) July 26, 2025
Which we know is a lie.
She is not a credible person. https://t.co/qWXsTwo5G5 pic.twitter.com/3qn97CjAmQ
Zero credibility. Which is why NBC News is interviewing her.
They, too, have zero credibility.
There is no chance that a guy facing prosecution for a "treasonous conspiracy" might not be telling the truth when he denies the accusations, right? https://t.co/iaZlh96IYA
— Austin Cole (@SeizerPouncicus) July 26, 2025
Not in NBC's eyes.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member