WHOA: Old David Hogg Video Right After Parkland Shooting Surfaces and X Peeps...
Hot DAMN! Tom Homan Goes OFF on Democrats After 'Anti-ICE Stuff' Found on...
Trans Dem Senate Candidate Shares CT Scan to 'Prove' Uterus — It Mentions...
Mayor Mamdani's Statement on Attack 'Outside 26 Federal Plaza' Has Glaring Omissions
EPIC X Post NUKES Mark Ruffalo From ORBIT for Attacking Elon Over Starving...
Let's Flash Back to When Democracy-Saving Lib Celebs Tried to Change the 2016...
'Get ALL of This': Marco Rubio Goes FULL RUBIO on CODE PINK Nutbags...
NYC Chaos: Suspect Deploys Incendiary Device Outside Federal Building; Arrest Made (WATCH)
Elizabeth Warren Puts Her Flawless Political Instincts Back to Work With MI Senate...
They Never, EVER Thought Trump Would Win: Obama Got REALLY Lazy, Ask Us...
The Merch Tent at a Sanders/AOC Rally in My State Was Bernie-Style Anti-Capitalism...
Former Obama Bro Proves There IS Such a Thing As a STUPID Question...
Zohran Mamdani's Attempt to Take Credit for World Cup Tournament Success Hit a...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
High-Water Marx? Scott Jennings Pushes Back on Progressive Corbin Trent Who Says Socialism...

Right on Cue, the New York Times Goes Full GRINCH With Anti-Christian Christmas Op-Ed

AP Photo/NBCUniversal Orlando

You can set your watch by it: the Left always finds a way to try and undermine Christian holidays like Christmas and Easter by writing op-eds that undermine Christianity.

Advertisement

They think they're really clever in doing so, but it just reveals how hypocritical and biased they really are, because they'd never do that with, say, Islam.

But -- like clockwork -- here's The New York TImes with their Christmas op-ed that seeks to unravel one of the biggest parts of the Christian faith:

See? Jesus wasn't the Son of God! He was just the product of rape by a Roman soldier!

You probably remember we wrote about Kristof when he was lying about Nevada's anti-abortion laws, blaming those laws for the brief incarceration of a mom who 'miscarried' (the Community Note revealed the truth, however). So forgive us if we don't believe him, or the author he's interviewing, on this.

But here's the interview:

The most startling element of your book to me was that you cite evidence going back to the first and second centuries that some referred to Jesus as the son of a Roman soldier named Panthera. These accounts are mostly from early writers trying to disparage Jesus, it seems, so perhaps should be regarded skeptically. But you also write that Panthera appears to have been a real person. How should we think about this?

Yes, these stories circulated after Jesus’ death among members of the Jewish community who regarded him as a false messiah, saying that Jesus’ father was a Roman soldier. I used to dismiss such stories as ancient slander. Yet while we do not know what happened, there are too many points of circumstantial evidence to simply ignore them. The name Panthera, sometimes spelled differently in ancient sources, may refer to a panther skin that certain soldiers wore. The discovery of the grave of a Roman soldier named Tiberius Panthera, member of a cohort of Syrian archers stationed in Palestine in the first century, might support those ancient rumors.

Advertisement

How insulting.

Give the man another Pulitzer, we guess.

Oh, so many things wrong with him.

Because they'd never.

Heh.

Exactly.

Advertisement

Utterly depraved.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement