Spencer Pratt Gives Gavin Newsom a Self-Awareness Check for the Ages After His...
I Will NOT Tolerate You! Justine Bateman DECIMATES Rashida Tlaib for Her Speech...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Garbage Time: Coach Kamala Delivers Platitudinous Pep Talk to Locker Room Full of...
NAZI-ing the Signs: Ro Khanna Claims Graham Platner’s Numerous Negatives Snuck Up on...
Dem Cory Booker Shares Fond Memories of Lindsey Graham in Online Video But...
I Believe I Can Fly: Video Captures Yellowstone Tourist Hurled Into the Air...
Chad Pergram Places Graham's Passing Into Historical Perspective
'These People Are So F-ing Stupid!' James Carville Posts WILD Rant Against Frankenstein's...
Report: House GOP Eyes Budget in Wake of Lindsey Graham's Passing
Mitt Romney Remembers Sen. Lindsey Graham With Ukraine on the Brain
DataRepublican Continues DECONSTRUCTING Candace Owens, This Time Taking Her Kirk Con/Grift...
Spencer Pratt Knows What DSA REALLY Stands for and BAHAHA
HO ... Sorry ... Ro Khanna Dramatically Thanking Peeps 'Concerned for His Safety'...
Never FAILS: Rest in Hell Trends After Graham Passes; Lefties Remind Us of...

Right on Cue, the New York Times Goes Full GRINCH With Anti-Christian Christmas Op-Ed

AP Photo/NBCUniversal Orlando

You can set your watch by it: the Left always finds a way to try and undermine Christian holidays like Christmas and Easter by writing op-eds that undermine Christianity.

Advertisement

They think they're really clever in doing so, but it just reveals how hypocritical and biased they really are, because they'd never do that with, say, Islam.

But -- like clockwork -- here's The New York TImes with their Christmas op-ed that seeks to unravel one of the biggest parts of the Christian faith:

See? Jesus wasn't the Son of God! He was just the product of rape by a Roman soldier!

You probably remember we wrote about Kristof when he was lying about Nevada's anti-abortion laws, blaming those laws for the brief incarceration of a mom who 'miscarried' (the Community Note revealed the truth, however). So forgive us if we don't believe him, or the author he's interviewing, on this.

But here's the interview:

The most startling element of your book to me was that you cite evidence going back to the first and second centuries that some referred to Jesus as the son of a Roman soldier named Panthera. These accounts are mostly from early writers trying to disparage Jesus, it seems, so perhaps should be regarded skeptically. But you also write that Panthera appears to have been a real person. How should we think about this?

Yes, these stories circulated after Jesus’ death among members of the Jewish community who regarded him as a false messiah, saying that Jesus’ father was a Roman soldier. I used to dismiss such stories as ancient slander. Yet while we do not know what happened, there are too many points of circumstantial evidence to simply ignore them. The name Panthera, sometimes spelled differently in ancient sources, may refer to a panther skin that certain soldiers wore. The discovery of the grave of a Roman soldier named Tiberius Panthera, member of a cohort of Syrian archers stationed in Palestine in the first century, might support those ancient rumors.

Advertisement

How insulting.

Give the man another Pulitzer, we guess.

Oh, so many things wrong with him.

Because they'd never.

Heh.

Exactly.

Advertisement

Utterly depraved.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement