Soros Silence: Scott Jennings Rebukes Dems on CNN for Focusing on Musk but...
Reid’em and Weep: Ex-MSNBC Host Tells Leftist Crowd That Fired ‘Journos’ Exiled to...
Replace Your Bettes: Dems Enlist Octogenarian Singer to Counter Trump’s UFC Freedom 250...
Platner Platitudes: Dems Jeffries and Warnock Regurgitate ‘Voters’ Decide’ Slop for Maine...
President Trump: Iran Deal is Now Complete
Griftin' Hillary Strikes Again: Clutching Pearls at UFC While Shilling White House Coaster...
Biden Loyalist: Platner’s Nazi Tat, Wife-Beating, Pedo App & Rape Fantasies Aren’t Just...
Jon Gabriel Explains Two Definitions of America
DeSantis Deserves Better: Florida GOP Must Honor a Real Debate Before Replacing an...
Report: 12 Dead After Airplane Crash in Missouri
One Year Down, Eternity with Weiner’s Sloppy Seconds: Alex Soros & Huma’s Cringe...
USA! There Is Pride in America To Be Found, Poll Result Tweet Indicates
A STUDY for This? DUH: X's Reaction to Study Showing Conservatives Are Happier...
'So Turned ON': One of America’s Most BADASS Presidents Roars Back to Life...
'Cute Speech. CONGRATS': Mark Cuban Shuts Ro Khanna DOWN in SURPRISING Back and...

Right on Cue, the New York Times Goes Full GRINCH With Anti-Christian Christmas Op-Ed

AP Photo/NBCUniversal Orlando

You can set your watch by it: the Left always finds a way to try and undermine Christian holidays like Christmas and Easter by writing op-eds that undermine Christianity.

Advertisement

They think they're really clever in doing so, but it just reveals how hypocritical and biased they really are, because they'd never do that with, say, Islam.

But -- like clockwork -- here's The New York TImes with their Christmas op-ed that seeks to unravel one of the biggest parts of the Christian faith:

See? Jesus wasn't the Son of God! He was just the product of rape by a Roman soldier!

You probably remember we wrote about Kristof when he was lying about Nevada's anti-abortion laws, blaming those laws for the brief incarceration of a mom who 'miscarried' (the Community Note revealed the truth, however). So forgive us if we don't believe him, or the author he's interviewing, on this.

But here's the interview:

The most startling element of your book to me was that you cite evidence going back to the first and second centuries that some referred to Jesus as the son of a Roman soldier named Panthera. These accounts are mostly from early writers trying to disparage Jesus, it seems, so perhaps should be regarded skeptically. But you also write that Panthera appears to have been a real person. How should we think about this?

Yes, these stories circulated after Jesus’ death among members of the Jewish community who regarded him as a false messiah, saying that Jesus’ father was a Roman soldier. I used to dismiss such stories as ancient slander. Yet while we do not know what happened, there are too many points of circumstantial evidence to simply ignore them. The name Panthera, sometimes spelled differently in ancient sources, may refer to a panther skin that certain soldiers wore. The discovery of the grave of a Roman soldier named Tiberius Panthera, member of a cohort of Syrian archers stationed in Palestine in the first century, might support those ancient rumors.

Advertisement

How insulting.

Give the man another Pulitzer, we guess.

Oh, so many things wrong with him.

Because they'd never.

Heh.

Exactly.

Advertisement

Utterly depraved.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos