Everybody Has the Same Question After Newsom Press Office Posts 'President With a...
Canadian Butthurt Over Joke About ‘Our Moon’
Under Duress: Colorado Demands Lawyers Promise Not to Aid Feds on Immigration or...
Harry Reid in 1993: 'No Sane Country Would Do This.' Harry Reid's Party...
MN Dems Still Debating Whether There's an Inherent Right to Life for... Wild...
George Washington’s Warning Morality and Religion Are Essential
No Need to Imagine, Sonny: We Lived It — Bunch Pretends Biden Never...
Results Are in: America Abandons Democrats As Trump Speech Sends Shockwaves
Chuck Schumer Admits Dems Held Up TSA Funding and Now He's Upset Trump...
Reports: Pam Bondi OUT As Attorney General and a Replacement Has Been Announced...
Politico's Scoop About What Trump's Iran Speech Would Contain Gets Tossed Into the...
Democrats’ Sanctuary Dream: Illegals Commit 75% of Murders in Fairfax County While Charges...
New Mexico Dem Rep. Stansbury’s Cringey Love Letter to ‘Dumbest’ Justice Jackson Gets...
Clueless No Kings Protesters Explain Why Trump's a Fascist and Insist Kamala Harris...
Dem Rep Asks Town Hall Audience to Raise a Hand If They Don't...

Right on Cue, the New York Times Goes Full GRINCH With Anti-Christian Christmas Op-Ed

AP Photo/NBCUniversal Orlando

You can set your watch by it: the Left always finds a way to try and undermine Christian holidays like Christmas and Easter by writing op-eds that undermine Christianity.

Advertisement

They think they're really clever in doing so, but it just reveals how hypocritical and biased they really are, because they'd never do that with, say, Islam.

But -- like clockwork -- here's The New York TImes with their Christmas op-ed that seeks to unravel one of the biggest parts of the Christian faith:

See? Jesus wasn't the Son of God! He was just the product of rape by a Roman soldier!

You probably remember we wrote about Kristof when he was lying about Nevada's anti-abortion laws, blaming those laws for the brief incarceration of a mom who 'miscarried' (the Community Note revealed the truth, however). So forgive us if we don't believe him, or the author he's interviewing, on this.

But here's the interview:

The most startling element of your book to me was that you cite evidence going back to the first and second centuries that some referred to Jesus as the son of a Roman soldier named Panthera. These accounts are mostly from early writers trying to disparage Jesus, it seems, so perhaps should be regarded skeptically. But you also write that Panthera appears to have been a real person. How should we think about this?

Yes, these stories circulated after Jesus’ death among members of the Jewish community who regarded him as a false messiah, saying that Jesus’ father was a Roman soldier. I used to dismiss such stories as ancient slander. Yet while we do not know what happened, there are too many points of circumstantial evidence to simply ignore them. The name Panthera, sometimes spelled differently in ancient sources, may refer to a panther skin that certain soldiers wore. The discovery of the grave of a Roman soldier named Tiberius Panthera, member of a cohort of Syrian archers stationed in Palestine in the first century, might support those ancient rumors.

Advertisement

How insulting.

Give the man another Pulitzer, we guess.

Oh, so many things wrong with him.

Because they'd never.

Heh.

Exactly.

Advertisement

Utterly depraved.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement