The Hack Is Back: Podcaster Jim Acosta Abandons Pool Duty to Encourage ‘Journo’...
Judge Says the Dumbest Thing Possible When SENTENCING a Hero Who Stopped a...
Psychotherapist Tells Newsweek How to Protect Boys From the 'Manosphere'
Migrant Charity in Scotland Gives 'Asylum Seekers' Lessons on the Age of Consent
'Utterly Surreal'! Flashbacks Like This Only Solidify Why the Trump WH Kicked Out...
Twenty-Two Dem States Suing to Force Trump Admin to Issue Green Cards to...
‘What Is the Point of You?’ Episcopal Priest Tells Dying Man She Has...
Rep. Ilhan Omar's Make ICE Pay Act Would Divert $140 Billion to Communities...
Pete Hegseth Says WaPo’s Middle East Death Toll Is Fake News
While Leftists Attack Billionaires, Elon's Implant Lets an ALS Patient Tell His Wife...
CA Attorney General Seeks 'Independent Content Monitoring of CNN' Under Paramount Merger
Unglued Awakening: Jessica Tarlov Shocked to Learn Conservatives Treat Her Better Than Far...
Lady Gaga Had a Baby at a Great Hospital — ‘Free Palestine’ Losers...
Program to Help Businesses Hurt by Operation Metro Surge Shut Down Due to...
Gas Prices Hurt and Sneering at Working Families Doesn’t Help

New York AG Letitia James to Host Buyback of Guns Government Didn't Sell Citizens in the First Place

AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews

Gun buybacks are the government's way to try and circumvent the Second Amendment. By offering money -- often less than the value of the weapon -- for you to 'voluntarily' turn over your firearms, they technically aren't violating the Second Amendment. But there's always the letter of the law and the spirit of the law.

Advertisement

Buying back those guns implies the government gave them to you in the first place. They did not.

And while you do you, this writer will never sell her guns back to the government. They were totally lost in a boating accident, anyway.

Interesting price breakdowns. Wonder what they classify as an 'assault rifle.'

Guess not.

The post continues:

Who is truly the target of this performative initiative, those perpetuating violence, or merely a constituency swayed by empty political theatrics? Our friend, Dexter Taylor, a law-abiding citizen with no criminal record or history of violence, now finds himself unjustly imprisoned for exercising his constitutional Second Amendment rights. His prosecution by Letitia James’ office appears driven by political motives rather than any genuine effort to protect public safety. It is imperative for New Yorkers to hold their government accountable and reject the corrupt practices that undermine both their safety and their fundamental freedoms.

Advertisement

We told you about Dexter Taylor here, when a judge said the Second Amendment doesn't exist in New York and when he was sentenced to a decade in prison for nonviolent 'crime' of building his own guns.

Yeah, don't do it.

Well, isn't that lovely.

Completely on-brand for government, frankly.

We noticed that.

We all know why.

Yeah, the Second Amendment exists in court rooms even if the judges don't like it.

Advertisement

Which is all government is good at.

Solid advice.

Never, ever.

The government can't buy back what it never sold you in the first place.

Always, invariably, followed by tyranny.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement